TOMORROW'S WORLD ORDER'S GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND PLANNING

Not even a smoldering stump left.  

One man for himself TWO for us all. 

Takeout all at once.

War. What is it good for? 

Ever wondered why mankind kill each other for? Is it to do with natural instincts to relieve pressure on resources or is it simply out of inferior thinking? It can be said that natural survival instincts cause mankind to kill each other. If it were animals, then one would say that it is simply nature, mostly for food. But for mankind, what are the real reasons to kill each other? It can’t be for food surely as in the animal kingdom. There it’s self-explanatory; anyone other than your kind is either food or an enemy. But if you all can talk and understand each other, why kill each other? But one might argue that this goes way back to the beginning of creation. Killings becomes part and parcel of mankind. Honestly, if you believe in the creator, then one would argue that it is part of creation to give mankind instincts to kill for the sole purpose of survival. Either kill or be killed. But is the killing as we are witnessing nowadays the intended plan of the creator? I know during the beginning days God or the creator made killing part and parcels of the whole system. The ecosystem cannot maintain the balance on its own therefore mankind has to keep everything balanced by eliminating others usually what they called the weak simply because these put a drain on resources for nothing without much benefit. It’s more like survival of the fittest evolution in creating people who have a will to live and fight forever possible the only way mankind must survive. Recall in earlier chapters I pointed out that the creator God or who you think created mankind new mankind in the end must become like him and manage earth just like what the creator does in heaven. God is like a master teaching mankind his student to become like him one day. But to be God or the creator is no easy task. Mankind must go through a series of tests and challenges and overcome all to be God one day. It does not stop there as mankind has to evolve and develop through all the stages and start thinking smarter rather than harder as what is happening now. The first chapters clearly laid out what I think is the development process the way we as humans must take to progress to the next level and one day think and act like God that is a superior being. Everything that is on earth is for our benefit to use and move to the next level. Likewise, there are also things on earth that are there as challenges to progress. Death itself is a test. A challenge to mankind. The difference between the creator and humans is that the creator does not die. Death is the only factor that distinguishes mankind and the creator. All humans no matter how powerful and rich you are death will come knocking as well. God knew for mankind to be like him he must go the extra mile and acquire superior knowledge that will see him overcome this challenge and live forever. I pointed out that even though you might not believe in God and all this creator stuff; it is more like general knowledge that can be applied to everyday life. If you are a teacher and you find a protégé obviously you will want your protégé to become like you one day and with this, in mind, God or the creator set up challenges that mankind has to overcome one day and one of the challenges is that of cheating death. Eliminating death and extending life to live forever. This is supported by Genesis 22v1. That God or the creator setup obstacles so that man cannot live forever unless he eats fruits of the tree of life. This is not literally eating fruits, but it’s acquiring knowledge that distinguishes you from everyone else that you will understand that death itself is a failure. Everything on earth that causes death can be overcome once one has gained that enlightenment. They say the biggest killer of mankind is wear and tear in old age that everything stops functioning but that wear, and tear is a challenge. Let’s pause for a while and ponder. Take the mechanical pulley system designed by man; the more it is used the more the worn parts and the less the lifespan. One day parts will simply fall. But a wise engineer will look after the pulley system maintaining it over the years. There is no engineer in his sound mind who would put grit inside the pulleys system simply because it will wear and tear very fast before you know it will simply be out of use. Is it wonder why a tortoise would live up to 200 years or more? It is not rocket science; wear and the tear simply do more damage and reduce the lifespan of tissue. This knowledge must be acquired mankind has to figure out a way of overcoming all the obstacles. Whether you believe in God or not, it is common sense that the sole purpose of life is to survive. Okay, mankind no matter what has natural instincts to survive. Some people have to die as part of nature to maintain the ecological balance but over some years it seems an evil force possessed mankind that the whole world started killing each other after some years that turns to be forgotten until a time when things turn ugly again. Mankind would group and start killing each other again.

I know most people would jump to the conclusion that this is part of nature’s clever plan to balance the ecosystem. As more and more people are born fewer and fewer people die especially when we spend a lot of money on the weapons and defense that makes it a time-bomb that war would be inevitable, I mean world war. It’s perfect logic that the more weapons we make the more we will need to justify such wastage of scarce resources that can only mean dirty tricks and all the sort and that alone will trigger a major world war. I know it might be remote, but everyone is watching everyone else and the watchers are being watched as well. They might pretend that their acts are Bonafide when we all know that they are evil to the bone and what can that only mean; future wars. But again, is this war just a war to balance nature? I think over the past 2000 years mankind has been missing these great chances, these great calls for help to move to the next level of development and in the end, mankind has failed to take the right turn going back round the way he came. It’s an opportunity being presented to him to challenge the norm and take a different route. We have gone in circles over the centuries. Wars have created a situation for us to take another route so that we don’t end up on the same route as before. I don’t believe these wars were just wars to easy up pressure on population and resources as some might argue? These wars were opportunities to push us out of defensive stages to another level of development. How often do you see the whole world taking sides to fight each other? I know it’s a fact that we are the architects of our downfall as we keep on making weapons and spending huge budgets on the military at the expense of other areas. This will only end up in a world war. The two world wars we had; namely World War I and II were not coincidences, no. These were outcries for help. Change or perish. Take a different route and one day become like gods. I know people might think I am taking them back to socialism. Is this socialism? But before I answer you let me finish on these world wars. A force in the world created sparks that would trigger a move away from defensive economies. These world wars were meant to traumatize mankind thereby temporarily making him insane or incapable of resistance so that the trauma of wars would push him to abandon making weapons and thinking about defense. In other worlds imagine witnessing a traumatic event so shocking that in logic terms you might be referred to as temporarily impaired in that whatever decision you make will be to a greater extent be influenced and guided by the traumatic events. In such cases, if given the same condition anyone put through this trauma but without experiencing this trauma would not make the same decision. Let’s say someone witnessed someone being hit by a car while walking on the pavement and soon afterward calls for a taxi to finish his journey. If that person had not witnessed the traumatic accident that person would have continued his journey on the pavement and on foot. In this case, the traumatic events enhanced the fears this man general has about the dangers of cars as we cross the road. This event is the trigger of the actions that followed soon after witnessing that event. Had this person not witnessed this event he would not have made such a decision? There are so many events that can be said to have a contributory effect in that the event acted as a trigger to whatever that person went on to do ceteris paribus. I can look at the 9/11 attacks in the USA and I can say with much conviction that what later followed was influenced by this traumatic event. We saw a lot of people buying their own homes fearful of towers and mistrusting renting property that in turn resulted in a lot of people who would not have taken out loans and mortgages to buy houses doing so. This later trigger the housing market crash as the people who could not afford in the first place just because of the trauma of witnessing the 9/11 attacks made unsound judgment out of fear and spend their savings getting homes they cannot afford in the first place. Had they not witnessed this event they would have kept their savings in their savings accounts and not opted to buy homes? Defense instantly becomes the sole determinant factor triggering the sudden rise in people taking mortgages and loans at the same time using their savings as deposit opting to own their homes away from the tall city buildings. When savings are gone all given to the banks, then there is reduced disposable income that in turn will trigger low purchasing power and less sales and profits of companies. This will trigger job loses that in turn will trigger repossessions and the people all now stripped off their savings are even more exposed. Now their savings have been taken by the banks and their homes repossessed and the traumas of the 9/11 events are still engraved in their minds that will send shock-waves that can result in a system crash. You can clearly see that every part is linked to the first trigger of the traumatic event. If it wasn’t for this event, the people would not need to be afraid of anything. They would have continued piling their savings. They would not have taken mortgages they cannot afford. They would have kept their jobs. One can vehemently argue that it is this traumatic event that caused the following decisions. If it wasn’t for this event, the people would not have taken the decisions, they took. But all this has nothing to do with the economy or does it? To answer this, I ask you a question. Who benefited from whatever happened after? To answer this, I will tell you in more detail the impacts of what happened.

9/11 attacks were meant to trigger fear, so that defense becomes our priority. Okay, you have been told that the idea behind the attacks was to instill fear by the terrorists. But hey this is a misconception. Fear that is meant to be induced by the terrorist would have little effect on your immediate and afterlife. Okay, you might not travel for a while, but life does not stop. It’s human instincts that people continued traveling the only difference being that they started taking precautions avoiding some airlines or airports, but this fear was only ‘imaginary’. No doubt that the acts were to instill fear but fear to do what or to trigger what? This fear was to traumatize the American people, so defense becomes the priority. So, you prioritize defense and temporarily make irrational decisions about buying homes which you can’t afford. So in short the event is meant to trigger temporary insanity so that you make irrational decisions and buy things you don’t need something that can be said as panic buying using the savings you have, actually stripping away your buffer the one you have before they make you lose everything. That time it will be a long time mainly two years after the traumatic event that at the point the fear due to nature will have disappeared as our minds would have forgotten that event from our immediate mind. In these situations, you hear people cursing themselves as if awoken from a trance. Okay, one might say it is their fault because no one held a gun to their head and say buy the house, no. So, everything bad is attributed to them in the end that they lose everything, the savings, and the house and now they are exposed even worse but at the same time, they have forgotten the traumatic eclipse that had clouded their judgments. They can’t blame the trauma simply because two years had elapsed and everyone ‘can’t feel it’ like the days and months after its occurrence even though it is still vivid in their minds. I am arguing that this is the work of a sophisticated highly educated and manipulating devil who has detailed knowledge of all this who plans relentlessly to manipulate and steal the people’s savings, putting them out of work and leaving them with nothing. It’s not a coincidence, no. I ask the question of how terrorists benefit from all this? This is the work of someone who wants to rob every one of their savings plus their incomes after that as they will spend more of their income on repaying the loans. Okay, I will put this in other words. 9/11 was a trigger to ‘take back the money from the people leaving the people in such a state that the economy would crash. Does this rhyme like a song? The trigger here is the crash.

“But wait a minute. Isn’t it the main purpose of that traumatic event?” one might ask.

Yes, this is the work of a very clever highly educated manipulating devil. 9/11 was meant first to crash the people; to put everyone who has witnessed the event in temporarily insanity state that they ‘crash’ to make irrational decisions and buy. This is the keyword. So, the event is not an event but a trigger of the decision to buy. Without this then the purpose of the event is not fulfilled. The traumatic event renders everyone who witnesses it incapable of making sound rational decisions. Fear incapacitates them that they only think about finding the strongest form of a place to live having seen the tallest buildings crumble to earth with such swiftness the only option temporarily considered as secure is the homes. I remembered in the science labs at school where you elevate the temperature of a lab rat through a diode chip fired into the lab rat so that the rat becomes thirsty and if thirsty body temperature is elevated, then it becomes hyperactive and if you don’t give it the milk or water, it becomes relentless and finds a way to get out. If it wasn’t for the chip diode fired into its body, the rat would not need something to quench its thirst. Or a perfect example is what these takeaway companies used to do before the salt ban. They used to deliberately increase salt levels of all their foods so that the customers naturally end up buying drinks not because they needed to but simply because the salted food would increase the need to drink soft drinks after. So, is this not what they call manipulating tricks? To answer you maybe I should ask who benefited from all this? But then again, I think it’s best to say the effect of such a move. Okay, the effect of all the fear and panic buying and the housing market crash, financial collapse, etc. was to take away money from the people, yes that’s right was to take money away from the consumers to whoever benefited in the end. What?

Yes. The effect is what I call rolling-back and taking whatever the people had back to the master planner. It’s like giving people then take back what you have given them together with what was theirs; in this case their savings. It’s like stealing. Giving them a magnet that will take all that they have when you take the magnet back. What?

Yes, it’s traumatizing you first then give you something so that when I take whatever I give you will lose whatever you have before the gift in other words a sophisticated robbery? The idea behind the plan was the targeting of the people’s savings taking everything they had saved and whatever they will work for after the gift and then take everything back and making people lose their jobs in the process so that in the end, they are worse off. Who on earth would do such a thing?

Terrorists? Please!!

Terrorists are people who live in caves. These people worry about putting food on the table let alone devising such a plan. It just doesn’t fit the picture. Terrorist’s aim is to kill and maim and even if they plan to rob your savings how will they get the money? Whoever is behind this is connected to people who would benefit from all this? Okay, I argued that the idea was to take money from the people, what they have saved and whatever they will work after that. The effect is like that of rolling-back. In the monetary world, we have the banks, the financial and investment institutions and then the government and on the other hand, we have the consumers most of whom work very hard saving for the future. In theory, money moves from the central entities the government, banks, financial institutions, etc. to the consumers as they work very hard and are reward or they borrow money as loans and repays these with interest. So money in theory can move from the central entities to the consumers and it can also roll-back from the consumers but only in very small amounts simply because the consumers are clever enough to understand that they have to keep much of their money in savings accounts away from the central guys who might want it back to their coffers. In reality, huge amounts of money flow to the consumers from the central entities and very little amounts trickle back as interests, bills, repayments, etc. The consumers have been very clever to put safeguards so that the money does not flow back to the central entities. Over the years the consumers have come on top with clever planning to avoid the rolling-back of the money. So, the central entities need a very clever plan to outwit the consumers who stick to their monies like magnets never letting it go. So logically the consumers are of very sound-minded very clever at their own game I think you can agree. The central entities to outwit them they must put them in a position of temporary insanity so that they don’t keep their money so tight. In that state, they can easily do things they would not normally do. But you are talking of torture. This is the only method that can render someone temporarily insane. This is a fact as even the FBI and CIA are known in the past to carry out torture practices, that often left a full-grown man with a brain of a toddler. So only torture can achieve their goal. Recall the rat lab in the science class with a chip diode shot into its body and the diode remotely heated up that in turn put the rat in hyperactive mode. All that is simply an act of torture. But in real-life unless secret weapons or instruments are used possibly stuffed deep in the muscles to torture the whole nation would be impractical and the consequences would be detrimental. But trust me another method can achieve the same results. The event must be broadcast live. Why? So that it is witnessed by many to have any traumatic effect. Ever wondered why we had camera crews waiting to film ‘perceived 9/11’ when the event occurred. The event to take any effect must be broadcast and seen by many. The horrific screams of people and the desperation must be live, so people feel the fear as people hopelessly meet death with everyone sitting unable to do anything. The idea here is to strip all those who witness the event in any form of hope. That makes the event so horrific that people would wish to dig holes into the earth and hide into them. Ever listened to the 9/11 calls when everyone is told to remain and sit still and wait for the rescuers until the final moment when they realize that it’s a death trap. This put’s the people in a serious traumatic position that some ‘temporarily crash’. This is the main idea. Crash. Once that state is achieved the event remains so vivid in the people’s minds for at least two years. I said that the effect is that of rolling-back the money from the consumers but what money needs to roll back?

On 10 September $2,3 trillion dollars was missing from the government coffers. What depletes the government’s resources more? Wages and salaries. The more people who are employed the more the government must pay more wages, etc. But I am not saying the government was behind this, no. Read carefully. Someone a financial institution or even a foreign government can be behind such a calculated move and just set up the government. This makes sense because I argued that the effect is that of rolling-back the money from the consumers back to the central entities. This would have taken all the people savings and income after that roll-back to the central entities. Is it wonder also that just after the attack huge housing initiatives were adopted to spearhead a housing boom? I am not saying this government policy was a calculated plan, but the government might have simply needed to address the people’s fears. It does not make sense though why housing when the towers were the ones destroyed. This method is what I call a third type of error. The only perfect situation this would have worked was when it was the people’s homes destroyed in the first place so that the government would provide cheaper houses. This would make sense as the home insurance payouts would be used as deposits for the homes issued by the government. Ever read about the great fire of 1666 Britain? So clearly from the onset, the method is set to fail. Imminent disaster. Such a traumatic event can only leave the people even more fearful and untrusting that they would only feel comfortable in their homes and not rented high rise accommodation. This as I shall point out is a third type error in that the government proposed solutions to wrong problems. First, the destroyed homes were not residential but some city office high-rise flats. This solution would have been the best had the planes destroyed people’s homes. This would have meant increased insurance payouts to cover and replace damaged and destroyed houses. So, the insurance money given by the central entities would have been used for deposits instead of the people’s savings. Okay, that is the monetary aspect of this event was this all? Unless it was deliberately to steal the people’s, savings and initiate a roll-back.

Fear and traumatic events of such magnitude would leave the people very vulnerable and scared that defense at any cost would then become their priority. This means even if before the event they were opposing e.g. any military action to be taken, now they would fully support revenge just as a natural human instinct they say nothing sweeter than revenge. A taste of your own medicine. Sometimes you are your best interpreter. Who best to tell you than yourself? So, one can argue also that this event made it possible to turn the hearts of the people in favor of military action than before the event. This is true two years after the event as the event is still in people’s minds. Support for retaliation and any defensive action is at the highest within the first two years than after as the traumatic imprints of the event are slowly erased to a mere recall of what happened that day rather than a stomach-turning event. No wonder sometimes we have horrible events every two years. Look at the USA 2001 we had the 9/11 attacks. In 2003 there was the space shuttle disaster and the Iraq war. 2005 Hurricane Katrina, 2007-8 Global financial crises. 2009 Global financial collapse. But what has all this to do with the wars?

Such events often trigger wars between countries because such a loss of life is very traumatic that countries might group to retaliate as with the Iraq war. Yes, this is the way mankind has been perfecting over the years to maintain the ecological balance.

Why the defense stage? To grow and prosper there must be an imbalance. It’s simple it must be easy to find resources and it must be dear to buy things. In a society that is fair then the price is set by the markets and other conditions. More often it is dear as well to buy and could be less profitable to sell. This is because a fair price of goods and resources is set by markets, so everyone pays a fair price. But when you pay a fair price, it means it’s expensive if you are buying and if you decide to sell, you won’t make a lot as the price is fair even to buy generally low returns. But when there is a huge imbalance and the prices are set by whoever has power, then it is easy to make huge profits as you can buy very cheap and sell at high prices. The defensive stage creates a situation where it is easy to get things if you can use some influence or worse force. That’s where weapons come in. The whole idea behind sticking in the defensive is that you get things cheaper. You can bully some people to get what you want. The defensive stage creates a bully-victim situation which facilitates the growth of the bully even to the enormous size. This is simply because the bully does not pay a fair price instead, he uses military force to get what he wants. Ever wondered why NATO etc. were really established? These institutions were created to sustain the bully-victim situation. After the war fuel rocketed sky high as demand increased as countries rebuild at the same time countries with oil supplies nationalized or come together too to act as oil cults in order to control supply. They knew oil prices will exponentially grow over time that it will be hard to buy this commodity at a high price. In response to the oil cults, the West established the weapons cult in NATO. Their only solution was to take by force if need be. No wonder now military cults were ever-growing receiving huge budgets and stockpiling weapons. We can see how world wars are inevitable simply because what is happening is that developed countries and military cults are getting resources all over the world and buying these at a fraction of their real worth and using these to make weapons and then in return use the weapons to take whatever is left and the money obtained is then plowed back into making more weapons starving other areas. If you recall earlier on, I talked about a process I referred to as rolling-back. This instance I am going to talk about a process I will call creaming-out. For an empire to grow fast and very big it can only do so if there is some form of inequality or bully-victim situation. The bully must get resources at low prices in this situation whatever is made by the bully is sent back to be sold at higher prices. But imagine when the bully is getting resources using threats and or force or buying very low through manipulation but whatever is taken is plowed into weapons manufacture. The weapons are then used to further take money from the victims unfairly and in most cases, through threats and intimidation the victim ends up buying the weapons at a high price creaming whatever is left. The process goes on and on but this time the victim is gaining weapons and now the more he starts seeing the bully-victim situation. Now the victim is slowly growing into a bully too. Now we have a bully to bully the situation a recipe for war. The more weapons he gets the more the anger and the danger. The bully, if he does not do anything, will be matched by the victim and it will be only a matter of time before a war breaks out. After the first two world wars, people realized that if nothing is done, these major world wars would be a common thing, and something was needed to ensure the forever existence of the bully-victim situation. Hence the creation of military cults like NATO. This guaranteed the bully-victim situation hence the imbalances, threats, and wars against often the victims whose resources are stolen or taken cheaply in exchange for weapons and support in terms of military training and personnel another form of bullying as a puppet is placed to replace the “evil” leader. Who does great harm someone who kills and oppresses his people over decades but hands out food to some or a force that kills 500 000 women and children in few years than the tyrant they toppled? That is a bullying tactic that silence any form of opposition from other countries in fear that they might end up experiencing the same fate. Everything is well planned and carried out according to the plan. They are very clever and very devious and manipulating. They are all members of a cult and what happens is that the major force proposes a plan to rob and take at force. They then decide others intervene as opposing but they make sure that the majority is in favor of the plan of the major force. In the end, the plan goes ahead but to all, it will appear as if the world is functioning with the observer and checkers and opposers who defends the weak and try to uphold the law but, it’s just deception. The bully has grown to such enormous size that talking of freedom and fairness is remote. Nothing wrong in growing to huge sizes but we know what happens whenever there is a bully. There is no talk of human rights or upholding international laws. We have countries abusing all laws on earth, torturing people in broad daylight, practicing modern-day slavery something purportedly to have been abolition years ago but just driven underground now being carried out through sophisticated devices remotely operated like drones. So, what the cults and institutions are doing is refraining and keeping the victim at bay so that they can’t form any military attacks. The cult grows huge and huge making even more weapons selling these and stockpiling some. The more power the cult has dominance over time and the less likelihood of major wars. In the past we have had world war one in 1914 to 1918 followed by World War II from 1939 to 1945. A closer look no matter what the reasons are, we can see that it took only twenty-five years to start the war cycle again. Then just after eight years, we had a Cold War that could have resulted in a Third World War. Come the 1960s just twenty-one years after the Second World War we have the possibility of another major world war with the threat of nuclear threats around the world. The reasons why these happen is not important in this chapter. Emphasis is to be placed on what I will call a war cycle. It seems at least every twenty to thirty years the war cycle repeats itself. I will look at the war cycle and its significance.

Like I have pointed out above nature has a secret system embedded in its DNA that is if it has one that stipulates and coordinates when we might have a world war. I have pointed out that every 20-30 years nature creates situations when mankind has to destroy all the weapons stockpile in the hope that mankind will see their mistakes and feel the pain of wars so that they can say ‘that’s it’ we have seen enough we don’t want any more wars. It’s a clever system to help mankind to move through the development stages. We have spent centuries in this stage from the early man-days. But those days it made a real sense. Defense was a priority or perish. Nature and everyone knew this. Those days it was defense first or perish. To explain the issues in this book, I used scenarios of the creator what I call, God’s plan. I argued that God or whoever you believe created mankind out of boredom set himself or herself a challenge; To create a being that will pass all the stages he has set so that one day the creature in man will evolve to the highest level of development like God himself. Here I am emphasizing that out of boredom God, or the creator created mankind to see if mankind can become like him and be a God here on earth. Something I have referred to as; God’s Dilemma. Same as man’s quest to create robots that can become like man himself; Man’s Dilemma. God or the creator does not need any creature mankind etc. to exist. God is omnipotent, omniscience and omnipresence and as such is the ultimate in terms of evolution and development while on the other end mankind is the low-level evolving creature same as animals but unlike animals with a potential to solve puzzles and evolve in the process to acquire such knowledge that he will become just like God; and live for forever. So, there are obstacles we must overcome and puzzles we must solve to evolve to other stages. Nature itself is designed by God to sort of guide mankind in which direction to take. Why I say this will come clear later. My arguments are that God drew a plan already and through the books bible etc. has given mankind hints on how to evolve. All mankind must do is to think and listen to all the tell-tell signs and progress to the next stage. Just like any puzzle, some stages provide perfect situations that I can call temptations, but these are to hold people in that stage stalling development or progress. It takes a great brain to notice that these are only stalling tactics just to slow progress and make you waste resources at the expense of other sectors. So I am saying that mankind instead of working around the issue has instead pretended to be clever and formed ‘cults’ to keep us in the defensive stage instead of thinking ahead and smarter and call wars a day and a thing of the past and progress to another stage of development. Why I am against sticking in the defensive stages is the fact that it wastes resources at the expense of other sectors. Your leaders are trying to juggle everything at the same time and instead of devoting resources where they are needed, they waste a lot on the military. God or the creator in my fictional analog created a plan where it is superior thinking to distinguish the important from the not so important and to choose the correct path. The idea throughout my book is the fact that a system crash is inevitable and a requirement. This can make sure we leave the current old system behind and go for a new system. A system crash can only pave the way for a move to a new stage. Why I am saying that there must be a complete crash and then a move is that like I pointed out above war and defense should be things of the past. In this analog, you cannot combine or transits to another stage carrying the two aspects simply because in my scenario the two are not mutually inclusive nor complementary. It’s either you drop defense and move to a new stage or stick in the defensive stage. The reason is that fear and threats whether perceived or imaginary cannot be quantified and as such defense and fear will only have exponential capabilities in that they are hungry for resources and cannot be tamed. How can you measure the threat posed by the opponent? Such attributes make defense a huge consumer of scarce resources and an ever-hungry animal in that as threat level changes we will keep making new and advanced weapons as technology changes wasting resources that could be used for something else. So defensive stages are popular as they consume a lot of resources and are challenging and very important to any success. This makes finding resources at any cost an important part of any government, cult or leader. The fact that defense also arms the bullies makes it easy for the bullies to use the weapons to fetch more resources to make even powerful weapons. Any system that is sustainable is a system that takes and contributes among all its parts. We have people buying resources to build goods and then the goods are sent and sold back to the people who in turn use the resources to make more money and resources. The resources are sold again and bought to make goods that are to be sent back to be used to make more goods. You can see that it is a cycle with everyone benefiting and resources and goods plowed back and exchanged so that the system is complete in that every part somehow relies on the other part to exist and function. But in defensive stages, this cycle is missing or ill-defined in that in the end war is inevitable. You can see that such a system is poised to fail and will only result in a war. War throughout this book as I will explain should not be viewed as a bad evil, act by mankind, no but as a call for help to change. The system as I explained has obstacles, bottlenecks, and puzzles together with temptations that will only stale development and make you waste resources. It takes a clever brain to notice all these and make the right decision. So, is an outcry for help the first proof that the system is not fair? Unless you change, then expect war. So, war is a trigger point. A highlighter that shows you malfunctioning in the system. In defensive systems or stages, the system is unsustainable in that it is meant to crash simply because it is unbalanced and unfair. I explained that the system needs an exchange of resources that facilitate the development and progress of those involved. The perfect system has inputs, processes, outputs, and feedback. In defensive stages the system is bound to collapse simply because resources taken are not matched by a share portion of goods or resources that some parts are stuffed continuously that in the end they are bound to fight back and crash the whole thing. This is the way nature intended things. But after the Second World War a few ‘clever’ or just plain arrogant leaders gathered together and tried to out-smart God or the creator and the system by removing a fuse and put a wire so that the system will never collapse or crash. But hang-on, wait a minute the idea behind a fuse is to protect any surge of unwanted power and prevent human destruction. These people have created a crime simply by creating these institutions and cults. See my point. The institutions created after the world war are there just to act to safeguard and perpetuate injustice and imbalance by removing the natural shock-wave into the system that will result in wars that will crash the system and corrects the unfairness. So, you can see my point that these institutions and cults are like wires replacing fuses. So, in fact the cults and institutions created after the world wars are there to keep us in the defensive stages forever or if they exist. If it is a safety test on a building, the building will fail the safety test because the fuses have been removed and replaced with wires in NATO, ICC, UN UNSEC, etc. It is a health hazard bound to explode. The warning system and the fuse system has been disabled. I pointed out that God is clever and therefore to test the cleverness of mankind he created he also created booby traps with a lot of temptations that will make mankind seat comfortable losing time and opportunities wasting resources in this stage. If this was a Survival-of-the-fittest or Rat-race competition, mankind will have lost already. Mankind might feel as intelligent as ever by creating these institutions and cults to keep us hooked on military and defense using the scarce resources on weapons which he stockpiles. This is going to result in total human wipe-out in that the fuses have been replaced by a wire so that in the event of a power surge there won’t be a fuse that will blow to stop and contain the power surge to avoid human extinction. I pointed out that in the early year’s survival depended on your defense. I explained the menacing dinosaurs, mammoths and saber-tooth cats. surely without proper defensive weapons and systems mankind could have been wiped out. So, defense was important to survive. But the dinosaurs and all that have since long gone. It is God’s or the creator's plan that in the early stages yes defense should be the sole existence of any government, institution or cult but as we evolve, we must put emphasis on other things in order to progress. I pointed in an earlier chapter that over the years simply because defense is the only stage mankind knows the best we have got stuck in this stage like forever to such points that even after the few foresighted argued for a move to the next stage of development your leaders went on to fake evil creatures like the UFOs and aliens to spread fear so that we remain in the defensive stage. This is the easiest stage mankind has mastered throughout history. We have heard stories of great battles and wars. After every war mankind has built even more destructive weapons and waited for the next war hoping that this time, he will win without losses, but my question is this; Was this the sole purpose of the war? Wars happen for a reason. I know most would jump to point out that the assassination of Ferdinand triggered the First World War and Hitler’s greediness when he discovered how beautiful the Polish women were that he decided to conquer Poland and decided to make them his were triggers of the Second World War. Or some might argue that it was the persecution of the Jews that triggered the war but do you know that all these developed countries especially Britain and Germany were advocates and some are still advocates of eugenics movements that incorporates and encourages all what happened to the Jews the concentration camps and all that? In this book I will use the idea of a perfect system I presented earlier on. The perfect system has inputs, processes, outputs, and feedback. In the early years before the first and Second World War ships roamed the earth collecting resources for making and expanding industries and making weapons, ships, etc. The weapons would then be sold back at huge prices facilitating and augmenting this process so that the bullies grew even bigger making even more weapons and goods and reselling them back. It was a perfect system. The only problem is that the Jews did not subscribe to such systems themselves having been taught by stories in the bible knew that the system was flawed and could only benefit the bullies. The main reason behind the extermination of the Jews was that the Jews were clever and never parted with their money. They created a bottleneck in the system in that the bullies made weapons that there was no market for and in turn could not get more resources to make more weapons and goods for expansion. Simply because the Jews those days when it comes to money were regarded as tight as can be. The Jews were very business-minded and would rather stuff their money away somewhere under beds and not in banks. This stalled the whole process. This is their only evil deed. Keeping to themselves what they considered as theirs. Hitler knew that this would stale the system and possibly crash the whole system and stale development. As such he rather would crash the Jews than let them crash the system. Damage was already done, and a new system was needed, and this came as an opportunity to them to in the process study the human body to understand it and develop medicine, etc. My point is that the imbalanced system if unchecked is poised to fail and crash resulting in a war. So, war is not a mere war but a highlighter of a problem that the system needs to be changed or corrected. We as humans we have feelings and flesh designed to suffer great trauma that will temporarily weaken mankind in that after the trauma fear and pain will make mankind take a different route and change. So, the idea of war is not simply to punish but to cause mankind to move to the next stage. This is different from torture in that torture is a crime, wrongdoing that will not encourage change but make whoever is tortured to remain in the same stage in the hope that torture will stop. It makes sense that this kind of pain is different from traumas of war that can awaken people if you like rather than dampen then simple because once torture is used and if you react, then torture becomes a form of communication and a form of forever-abuse. This is the main reason torture or any form that resembles torture is internationally outlawed. But you might ask why torture is prevalent in Britain and USA etc. Simply because these countries know that they have put institutions and cults that first make them big bullies that no one will challenge them.  Look at all the wars these two are at the forefront defending illegal practiced outdated laws and views. Using weapons to rob oil and kill 500 000 women and children in a few years more than killed by the person who they are toppling. They have the backing of their institutions, UN, NATO, etc. in which they are all members. They have grown to such an extent that if it wasn’t for these institutions a World War Three could have already occurred and mankind could be at another stage of development. Imagine a world without the UN or NATO? Do you think they could have invaded Iraq? All the UN resolutions and voting it’s just to make you think that the wor

*A new beginning can only start if there is a form of balance. *A new beginning can only start if there is a form of balance. *Evil with evil. Kindness with kindness. No one is immune.

*I think it’s fair to address a question I often find being asked;  

*Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and           courts as a deterrent.

First, what is a freedom fighter, a new visionary, a New World leader, and a terrorist? I think the point to note here is the fact that this is a subjective subject, and it all depends on who is talking and from what point of view. I think the current system is oppressive but I can’t call myself a freedom fighter because I am not fighting for any freedom rather I think myself as a new visionary a powerful tomorrow’s world leader someone who wants to lead the way but here and there look back to see who is following and decide if I have to drag you if your pace is slow? I think ignorance is a real reality, and most people do what they do simply because this is the only way they know. All past generations have lived this way and were successful so why change if things are working properly. The saying that says; don’t fix it if it’s not broke apply here but I think if you show people another way and convince them that this is the right path and this is how I think it’s the right path some people might and will change their ideas about the current situation. I highlighted from the beginning that we are still in this defensive stage of human development simply because this is a tried and trusted way of doing things. It is the most successful way of running a country. Do you know the most remembered Presidents or Prime Ministers are war leaders? Yes, it’s human nature that sometimes we are brought alive after seeing or experiencing traumatic events so wars kick-start or rejuvenate people’s lives. I think we have been led to believe that life is tough and to survive some of you must die it’s like a survival of the fittest thing. It seems it is in our DNA to kill others, so we survive in relation to resources, etc. but did you ever think that no one must die but we must get rid of some activities to free up resources for other pressing issues? I know centuries ago war and the military and defense were very vital to the survival of any country and its inhabitants. Defense was paramount as we had all kinds of threats from dinosaurs to other barbaric people. Yes, without a strong defense surely you would not stand a chance. But this is 2000 years ago. The only threat as far as I am concerned is from mankind himself. The more we became advanced, we became more knowledgeable as well, and we tend to understand things better. Every time we had a major war was a critical chance to move away from the defensive stages to the next level. Every world war must be viewed as a crash of the system. Recall from earlier chapters I explained that if a system is not fit for the purpose and it’s not working that system will inevitably crash to pave way for a new system. So, whenever we had a world war that was a critical point in time because it means that the system had crashed, and a new system was a must. It’s the same with the computer system if a system crashes usually a new system is needed there is no point trying to fix it simply because once it has crashed it means something is wrong and this might happen again. A wise man would not try to fix or mend the system but would understand that the system is unworkable and must be replaced. Having this in mind, I think to understand this look at it this way. View the whole system as an airplane. Imagine it’s a cargo plane and somehow something goes wrong and the plane crashes to the groundbreaking into smaller pieces millions of them. Would you take all the smaller pieces and reassemble them and fix back the plane? What would be the chances that it will crash again? It’s the same principle some things are not amenable once it crashes no matter how you can fix it that’s not the point once it’s down it’s rendered obsolete. Fixing would only increase the chances of the cargo plane crashing again. Once broken and will never be the same again. So, having this in mind once the First World War broke out in 1914 it was time to completely change the whole system abandon war, abandon making weapons, work hard to establish links and relationships so that tomorrow you negotiate and try to find solutions. The best period for negotiations is and was after the world wars. This is true we saw people forming partnerships and groups and negotiating deals but because there was no one with a vision to solve the issue once and for all and lay a clear foundation that will make wars a thing of the past. That catalyst, that visionary was missing and as people make deals, there was no one to put down plans and laws that will make wars a thing of the past. So, whatever the people negotiated was simply in vain as suspicion and the fear of surprise attacks made countries group together forming cults.  It’s a fact that wars have no winners simply because everyone suffers horrendous causalities with millions of ‘boys’ and girls’ [soldiers] dying. So, what happened after the First World War was that people gathered together to fix the system rather than to replace it with another system that avoided wars.  So, fixing only made the countries group together to avoid heavy losses in case the war broke again. This was not the answer. It is human nature that experiencing such traumatic war events was meant to send fear and trauma so traumatic that people would throw away anything to do with wars away; weapons the military and seek links and connections. But they only fixed the system and even made more destructive weapons. Nature somehow sensed that mankind had not learned a lesson. If I was father-nature, I would be saying I told you, you are wasting time and resources. War! What is it good for?  See the destructive effect of wars. So why not change completely? Abandon wars and start listening to each other. All this money you are wasting on wars surely could be used somewhere as. Why not build personal planes and travel around the globe? You don’t need weapons.  Dinosaurs are extinct. There are no aliens and your only enemies are yourselves. So wise up!

Just after 22-25 years, another war broke out the Second World War. Another system crash in less than 25 years. They fixed the system instead of putting a complete new one. Yes, they simply fixed that cargo plane with the same materials what else did you expect? They saw this coming. This is another call for help. It’s a critical time change quickly, but that fell on deaf ears. Another traumatic war broke out. Millions lost and now this time the people acknowledged that they had made a mistake the first time after the First World War. Yes, they had fixed the system instead of completely changing it. Something crashes simply because it’s not fit for the purpose. Again, the same mistake. Instead of a complete change, another system fixes, but now with added support that it will never break again but at the same time never be fit for purpose. Okay, the first picture might seem like a perfect solution. This was their solution. Group into even bigger cults to avoid the impact. Now be proactive don’t let these enemies group as well. After the First World War what happened is that the Allies grouped into military cults without being concerned about what the enemy was doing. They chose what I would call a defensive approach.

A defensive approach does not consider or consider the enemy’s strength and weakness in that you are only concerned about protecting yourself. The Allies [UK, USA, France, Belgium, etc.] took approaches to fortify themselves to avoid severe casualties. Strength in numbers. They did not worry about what the axis [Germany, Japan, etc.] would do. They increased their budget spending and built more powerful weapons hoping that will put the enemies at bay and in the event of a war they would stand a better chance of winning. Just after twenty-five years, this proved as an inadequate approach as the Second World War broke out with even severe casualties. They realized that no one wins a war and war is not discriminatory it impacts everyone. A new approach was needed.

The Second World War was even worse than the First World War. The Allied realized that being just defensive was not enough they had to put things in place. No one was there to act as a visionary and mediator a negotiator leader to lay the new road. They knew fixing and mending the system was not the answer, but they did not know which road to take. So, they stuck to what they know best and put things in place that will make it hard for a Third World War to break out. Still not the correct solution. The system had crashed twice in less than thirty years. Surely something was not working. So, they fixed the system and put things in place to hold the system in case it crashed again. Taking our example of the cargo plane what they did was fixing things like foams underneath the plane and parachutes to hold the plane in the air even if it stops working in the air so that even if it crashes, the impact will be a minimum. But is this a solution? It’s like a mechanic when the gearbox breaks take wires and hold the gearbox together and continue to drive. Yes, the car might still drive but it’s only a matter of time when things will go wrong with serious consequences. This time the Allies adopted what I referred to as the Colony or Society or Enemies Collapse Strategy.

The Allies realized that attack is the best form of defense. The last method of being defensive yielded even more pain. The best form was never to make their enemies be able to group. They realized that they let their enemies also come together and mobilize. This time they targeted any potential enemies who might start a war. They adopted the Enemy Collapse Strategy. This strategy targets the male alpha who is a leader and a role model. Someone the young fighters would die for. The strategy is to eliminate this leader in public using extreme force sending shock-waves so that no one will think of mobilizing support against the Allies. Once eliminated the Allies then would choose a puppet who would comply with the Allies demands.  A list is compiled for the next 25 years showing who and when to eliminate that potential threat. The potential threats are ranked in order of the threat they pose. If the threat is a low-level a court that was to be established would deal with him and if the threat level was considered high military force would be used. So, we can see a pattern appearing here. Oil-rich countries mainly in the Persian Gulf have the potential to buy WMDs or nuclear weapons and so are a higher-level threat and for these only immediate military forces must be used. The idea is not to go to war with the whole country but to target the tyranny but in the process send shock-waves that no one would think of assembling support against the Allies. Whoever is left is rendered useless to launch any attack. Just like in the Colony Collapse Studies. The young males who are left will have no role model in the alpha-male-bee to look up to are afraid that they ignore their duties to take over as the new leaders. The colony suffers as no one will take leading responsibilities to look after the colony. The young ones have no one to feed them poverty and starvation weakens the people that in the end, the colony collapses. 

So how to carry these strategies? Establishment of the ICC to target the low-level potential threats mainly from Africa. NATO to act as a deterrent to any other countries forming into cults like NATO itself. Even after calls for the Asian countries to establish their own equivalent of NATO, they have refused simply because they know they would be attacked and can’t match NATO. But if NATO would go around exercising military attacks, then it would be seen in a bad way around the world. So, the two most powerful countries the ‘Ghost and the Darkness’ in the USA and the UK would militarize around the enemy the potential threats with a 25years list compiled targeting potential threats.

You see what happened is a third type error prescribing a solution to the wrong problem or prescribing a wrong solution to the problem with the result that that does not solve the problem. World Wars were a critical point that highlighted the need to change. Think of this like a fire alarm. If the building is on fire and is going to collapse and the fire alarm sounds, you run out to safety, right? What happened when the first fire alarm sounded no one ran out of the building but they fought the fire putting pillars so that the building doesn’t collapse? They put even more fire alarms to warn them much earlier so that they have better chances of fighting the fire. This was the First World War. Years later another fire broke out and the building was going to collapse as well, and the fire alarms sounded. Again no one ran out of the building instead they fought the fire very hard putting more pillars so that the building won’t collapse. They contained the fire, but this time removed all fire alarms so that no alarms would sound again but instead nominated institutions to deal with whoever was causing the fire. They ranked the threats and delegated people, institutions, and countries to deal with the fire starters. The ICC to monitor low-level leaders while the Ghost and the Darkness monitoring high-level threats. This must be reviewed every 25 years. So, what I am saying here is that this is the wrong solution. Surely when the fire starts, and the building is going to collapse you don’t use pillars and fight the fire and remain inside. Common sense you would run out. Get the building destroyed completely and build another one. This is human nature. This is the way it should be. You have peace of mind. Stress levels at a minimum you are not going to worry that the building might collapse again. Above all, you build a new building that is even better and fit for the purpose. Imagine the building was built 25 years ago. The materials might be old and weak. You might have used out-of-date materials or paints. There could be now environmental good paints that are not harmful to humans. Trust me the building you make now will represent you and the current atmosphere than continue in a building built 25 years ago maybe for a different purpose by different people. I am saying we are still in the building that collapsed not just twice in 1914 and 1945 but three-times and in the 1960s. Yes, the building collapsed three-times. In 1960 we had the Cold war. But I told you what happened after the Second World War. To prevent this from ending up into another World War Three they removed the fire alarms completely. So, it was not so loud than the first two world war alarms and a few people knew about this the sirens were silent hence the Cold war. But it does not mean that the system did not collapse. This time they had put firefighters inside the building to tackle small fires quickly before they became a problem. We have the ICC inside the building that collapsed three-times tricking and trapping low-level threats in African leaders and some Asian leaders. On the other side, we have NATO doing nothing but simply expanding its wings and showing off its potential destructive power as it simply sounds warnings constantly to deter any, enemies. In the center of the building, we have the Ghost and the Darkness mauling any potential threats working on the list they were given 25 years ago. It has been another twenty-plus years, and now the NATO, ICC and the Ghost and the Darkness inside the building have made it less visible to outsiders that the building collapsed. These three are there to support the three-times collapsed building. The structural damage is massive, but they would rather leave it that way. A few people knew this third collapse I told you why they disabled all the fire alarms, so the third collapse is called the Cold war.

Yes, the building collapsed three-times, 1914, 1945 and between 1960-1970s. But it’s not just that. The potential threats have realized that the Colony Collapse Strategy is in effect, so they have devised new methods of revenge attacks. The rise of terrorism. They have realized that the Allies are never going to run out of the building but would rather hang in there. So, they devised plans to go in there as well and blow the building up to cause it to collapse. We have terrorist attacks, but the Allies are adamant that this system is fit for the purpose simply because they built the system and it only benefits them at the expense of everyone else. It is like a gangster or a bully now. Going around flashing guns and even using these to take resources when the poor nationalize their resources. They often send the Ghost and the Darkness the front line to do their dirty work.

The Allies removed fire alarms so that they will never leave the building. Why leave when they are winning when they want, they just use military force to invade a sovereign state. NATO is there backing them deterring any potential threats. We have a bully and or a gangster and he is raking havoc everywhere. 500 000 women and children dead within twelve years and it took Saddam twenty-five years to kill half; 250 000. Who is the real tyrant here? But this is not the issue of the day.

It’s not about the gangster in the hood or the bully no. A visionary would see the potential impact of the current system. We are still spending a lot of money on the weapons and the military but the ICC and the Ghost and the Darkness are working very hard to eliminate the potential threats. Who will be your enemies? Who will you go to war with? Despite the growth of NATO in recent years still, the Allies are eliminating any potential competitors. In the past, we had two world wars because no one targeted the opponents. It was a fair playing ground. Now they are eliminating all the potential competitors while still making even more destructive weapons. Even the Allies realized that the play aren’t fair and now are afraid that the current opponents would end up making secret nuclear weapons that are even more destructive to match the Allies, NATO, ICC, the Ghost and the Darkness’ power. Yes, any reasonable man faced with such a mighty destructive power would only look for ways to increase his own impact in case of attacks and the only answer is to go nuclear. This is the greatest problem. This is the problem the Allies are afraid of because both sides will use whatever they can with the smaller enemies with nothing to lose. This is a critical issue. Dangers of human extinction.

It’s not surprising that the Allies were on the forefront crying foul play fearing that the opponents were making WMDs. It’s logic that if someone is squashed like they have done to the Africans and the Persian Gulf countries, in the end, they will have nothing to lose but to try to out-smart the Allies by making even more powerful weapons. We have seen the Bush government using this argument to wage wars around the world. They even know that the system isn’t fair and is one-sided and what a bully can only do, or a gangster is to get whatever they want using force. The scary question is this; does that include eliminating certain countries or even continents using even more powerful weapons? Could this have led to the uncontrolled use of biological and recently digital or high-tech cyber weapons to eliminate certain people off the face of the earth? Who will stop them the more they grow and the more they eliminate people on the 25-year-old list? Who will level the playing field? There are rumors that they are crying foul-play with regarding the production of WMD, but they are making these WMDs. These are in the form of small high-tech-devices that are implanted or chipped into the body. These devices are remotely loaded with digital viruses and cyber electromagnetic weapons to test and eliminate the less developed countries. Who will stop them?

My personal issues are not fear-founded as a visionary I don’t care whether NATO grows even bigger or not my concerns are with being stuck in the defensive stages of development where wastage is at maximum and progress minimal. Where the underlying principle is that of making weapons cheaper and then use these weapons to get all expensive resources like oil etc. Okay if there is no other option it can be expected. But we are saying we have solutions. But first, let me explain more. In the defensive stages, fear makes mankind get stuck in there with little progress as mankind invests heavily in weapons and the military. Imagine all that money being spent elsewhere in research and development to live forever, to fight aging, to connect the world, to look for other planets where humans can relocate to make robots to work for us, etc. My concerns are that humans have removed the fire alarms in the form of wars but continue to make weapons and creating a bully or gangster while eliminating enemies one by one year by year. My main concern is that they still invest heavily in the military. Who is your enemy? I know the first word that comes to mind is Russia. Russia? So more than twenty NATO countries are investing heavily in the military to fight Russia? I know the military solves every President or Prime Minister’s political problems. The military provides easy reasons to achieve political agendas. Huge military budgets mean plenty of jobs everywhere, weapons, satellite, aircraft, infrastructure, personnel, etc. But we can do better as a people. The more we form partnerships globally with North Korea and the USA once sworn enemies negotiating the more the chances of moving away from defensive stages. I think we need to evolve as well. Reduce the budgets, ban wars and weapons production globally, evolve find other activities like research into space crafts, passenger-planes operates like missiles, etc. to send people to other planets, etc. even into research and development to increase life instead of taking life.

The defense stage is the greatest impediment to the New World. All the problems hindering progress are because of this stage. Like I said earlier on these two stages are not complementary it’s an either-or situation. Defensive stages encourage everything that conflicts with the first rule; the right to life and the right to self-preserve. This stage is a resource-hungry stage that will only mean starving other areas. It’s impossible to choose defense and networking and cooperation at the same time. You can say everyone is my friend and carry on making weapons. Who you are going to use the weapons on? You can’t say everyone has rights to life and nothing will override that rule and declare a war that is poised to kill thousands of innocent women and children something against the right to a life of everyone. So, it’s an either-or. Hence the current problems.

Defensive stages encourage the making of weapons to end life in the form of guns, missiles, grenades, etc. and recently the rise of biological, digital and electromagnetic weapons in the form of viruses. Defensive stages encourage governments to starve other areas. We have poverty in developed countries like the UK and the USA. This is shocking but understandable as a misuse of resources and regardless of human life. A misunderstanding of the first rule that everyone has a right to life and to self-preserve. Starving someone threatens that person’s right to life as food is needed to sustain life. So, you can see why this is not just a gross violation of human rights but a crime in the New World that can result in a leader losing his or her own life. Value other people’s lives and have yours valued too. Disregard the lives of women and children and face the assassin. It makes sense if you follow the new rules and acknowledge the first rule everything will fit into place. Value the lives of children and women and everyone else then you would not build massive weaponry instead you would make sure that these people have everything that they need to live forever. That forbids misuse and unnecessary wastage. You would not make weapons that would threaten the lives of kids. I know now no one cares if the kids are not the same background or genetic heritage. Therefore, I have introduced laws that look at a lack of empathy connotations in relation to the needless loss of human life. I explained in other chapters that in the animal kingdom it is acceptable for animals to kill their own for strategic reasons for example if the presence of a young one threatens the survival of the whole group. This is because food might be scarce, and this puts the mother in danger as it might have to travel far where there is danger looking for food. But for another animal to kill another’s curb that does not belong to itself is another issue. If animals are clever to recognize this why do, we let some people kill thousands of other genetic heritage’s kids when one of their dies the whole world stands still?

As a visionary and the leader of the New World, I think my concerns are that the more weapons we make the more we are shooting ourselves in the head. The bigger the bully becomes the greater the chances of nuclear self-destruction events. The weaker will one day find ways of matching this ever-growing bully or gangster group that one day they will use WMDs for real as they will have nothing to lose. The second reason is that it’s unwise and irresponsible to remove fire alarms and fight the fire in an old building that has collapsed more than three-times. Why not be clever? Run out of the building when the fire starts but first reinstall the fire alarms. Remove this ICC and NATO and level the playing field again. Play like boy’s fair and square encourage competition let be there another World War 3 or 4 whatever once you have quenched your ego then can I lead you to the next stage. I know boys being boys’ weapons are your best friends. Big guns better! What I am objected to is just having big guns just for displaying. That’s bullshit. We need all the scarce resources we can get. If you have no guts to use the weapons why do you make the weapons in the first place? Have guts and balls of gold and level the playing field. Let’s see who the big boy is. Let’s destroy all these weapons we surely don’t need these. Why make things you will dump in the end when kids are suffering for a meal? Make things you can use or don’t make at all.

Or if you are a chicken, then forget about fighting and all that. Throw away all these weapons admit you have wasted your resources but draw a line and never waste these scarce resources again. Change. Dig a small hole and spit in it. Say never again will I waste resources when kids are dying of hunger. I will show you a new way. But first I want you to quench your fighting thirst. So, I will invoke the third real-world war. I will give you a chance to play the boy’s games. Kill each other. Test your weapons. Celebrate victories for this shall be the last time you will ever experience war again. After this, I will change everything for good, I mean forever.

Enjoy this last war for I have written new laws already. Wars are going to be a thing for the past. The military shall evolve into the highly trained and highly paid assassins. There shall never be any weapons manufacturing. The military budget will be cut or reduced depending on the amount of evolution. I shall declare the end of the defensive stages. No enemies anywhere unless we have new threats from other planets. We are going to work together, competing and investing heavily in research and development. We shall work at our optimal capacity using resources wisely. The self-esteem of the world’s people shall be at the highest levels that no one will think of killing themselves or dying instead all will try to find solutions so that they can live forever simply because life will be that good that everyone will long for more. The defensive stages will be a thing of the past with its depressing attitudes. In the New World, everyone will have the basic life with no beggars, etc. Unless institutions like NATO evolve greatly, I don’t see their future in the New World simply because they were created with wars and defense in mind. It’s because of these institutions that we have been stuck in this stage for the past seventy years. I explained why. It’s like removing a fuse and replace it with a strong wire and the end is going to be very bad. The whole thing can explode killing everyone. This is a poor inferior way of solving problems. I suggest building a brand-new modern building with everyone chipping in their desires, plans, and visions. All this issue of staying in the not-fit for purpose old building, removing fire alarms and putting in the ICC and NATO to prevent the inevitable is not only silly but a criminal offense. If it’s an electrician doing this, he would not only lose his job but will have criminal charges brought against him. This is dangerous and likewise, the current system is like a time-bomb waiting for the slightest trigger not just to kill the enemies but everyone else so it’s suicidal. We have a moral duty and obligation to protect humanity even if it means protecting it from yourselves. There are international laws that fall in what is called the Jus Cogens laws and these laws are universal in that everyone knows these laws and there is no excuse whatsoever. Ignorance is not an excuse. Breaching of these laws can and will make one be regarded as  Hostis Humani Generis; an enemy of mankind in that such a person or cult poses a real threat not just to others but to themselves as well so as such everyone else has Responsibility to Protect everyone else from such a person or group of people. If it’s a cult such as NATO provoking others committing crimes of aggression, the whole world can gather together and serve justice. No one is immune. Having said that, I think it’s fair to move to the main theme of this chapter. Justice and reconciliation.

But first I think it’s fitting to address the issue of a terrorist or not.

I know I have been very harsh throughout this book and some might start to wonder whether there are chances people might regard this as terrorist material.

What is a terrorist?

“a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” 

Google Dictionary.

‘someone who uses violent action, or threats of violent action, for political purposes.’ 

Cambridge Dictionary.

“Domestic terrorism: Perpetrated by individuals and/or groups inspired by or associated with primarily US-based movements that espouse extremist ideologies of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.” 

FBI website.

The first definition clearly states that a terrorist uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians. This is true of terrorists they target civilians in what is called ball-rolling. They let the civilians interpret or translate their messages. They are indirect complainers if you like. Terrorists most will never target the politicians concerned but rather would let civilians plead their cause. They go behind someone else; - the civilian. In the New World, I explained that civilians are the most valuable of all in that new laws protect them at the expense of the politicians, etc. This means that I am different from these terrorists who target innocent people. Terrorism conflicts with the first rule. The right to life and the right to self-preserve and terrorists are illegal too in the New World. We as the New World will never target civilians no matter what. We don’t do ball-rolling. Terrorists are freedom fighters, and most grieve and advance certain issues they want addressed by the politicians of the day through civilians. Terrorists’ agenda does not involve changing the current system rather they fight for certain freedoms or rights or access to certain areas. Unless their demands are met, they will keep on killing innocent people. This has nothing to do with advocating for change for a new direction etc., no. Terrorists might have cells everywhere, but they fight in certain areas at a time. Their demands are usually trivial and specific to certain areas. They often have specific demands with certain countries e.g. the USA and certain individual groups like Christians etc. there are of a local nature. This isn’t us for we represent the whole globe. Our issues are not tied to a certain country or region or continent, no we are global. The issues we advance are on behalf of all mankind regardless of genetic heritage, social standing, religion, creed, etc. we are a global movement. Our issues have a global impact and we don’t address specific countries we address the whole globe and the key players like NATO, the UN, ICC or the EU, UK, USA, etc. Want we are calling for is for the betterment of mankind regardless of geographic area or religion, or color, etc. We represent humanity and it is our Responsibility to Protect humanity from a few irresponsible people who want to take things into their hands and bring all humanity to extinction. I ask you a question; when you call for a cab going home after drinking just a glass of wine at dinner then you realize that the cab driver is so intoxicated that he doesn’t even know what he is doing would you just sit in that cab and hope for the best? Or either you shout and ask to get out simply because the driver is putting your life in danger. So, if this is the case how would our movement be compared to terrorism? Terrorists kill to revenge their own losses. They don’t kill to push agendas, and, in most cases, they are reactive in that they have grieved first and then take revenge action to send a clear message. We are not revenging anyone for the sake of revenging there is a big difference. What we will do is level the playing field. See us as the equalizers. We are not revengeful as the terrorists do rather, we let you decide if your acts have been just. If you cry foul, then you are guilty because all we did is recreated your own acts and so since you started the ball-rolling you face the consequences first. It’s fair and square. Sometimes people make decisions and don’t even know the impact of their actions so our duty for the sake of peace is to recreate past evils and see how you react and judge our next move based on that. To move forward to the next stage of development requires a neutral position from all people involved. This is very important. I illustrated that it was hard after the two world wars for the people to trust each other that there will never be war again without anything tangible. Imagine if you have lost a million soldiers then after the war someone says let’s make peace from now on let’s shake hands on it. You then find out that only you suffered a million loss, and they lost only a hundred men would you take their word for it and forget a million of your men that perished at the hands of the person you just shook hands with? Imagine the families of those who died coming to you and ask you if it really was peacetime dreading further loses. Surely it will be hard to trust your enemy especially if they have lied or tricked you before. You will be cautious. Our duty is to come and level the playing field. Offer everyone a neutral position put laws and follow these to make sure that no one reverts. Assess situations to make sure say in the above case the other man lost a million men through a genuine mistake then we can assess for any deception etc. and level the playing field so that deals that are to be made tomorrow will be binding and trusted by all. When I say no more wars, no more weapons manufacturing, selling or exchange or any use then no one will ever use these again. We don’t want situations where people would secretly make weapons to ambush the people who have done great damage in the past. When war is over, then it’s over because no one will be allowed to put huge defense budgets all this money will be channeled into other areas?

Our intentions are bona-fide. We are not a bunch of some inferior-thinking or grieved lunatics bound for revenge. Whatever we do today has great implications for the day after tomorrow where it really counts. It will be hard but with all the things we are putting in place, we will achieve our goals. Our aims are for the benefit of all mankind. I think it’s irresponsible and an unforgivable crime to make massive highly destructive weapons to kill the starved women and children to get rid of them or reduce their numbers that way. We can’t tolerate that anymore or let anyone do such an inhuman degrading treatment. It’s time someone stands up and shows you the way. So here I am. Our plans are perfect plans for everyone. Imagine in 2017 global spend on military was $1.7 trillion according to the arms watchdog. If it was ten years ago, no one would care because the world was volatile. Nations were against each other. No one knew if we were ever going to come to talking terms. So, defense was justified. Ten years down the line surely a lot has changed, and it’s time we also realize that the military has become obsolete. Our own threats are our own selves. We would like to build a better world. A world where people would wish to live forever not like today where suicide rates have shot to the roof. All this money can do good in other areas. We can eradicate poverty and all kinds of problems and give humanity a basic life. I know some might be saying here go the socialist again. There is nothing socialism about our aims and objectives. If there is an element of socialism, then it’s a by-product of the outcome and not our direct intention. We are not saying give away all your wealth to the poor, no. We are saying let’s use the resources effectively and where they are needed the most. All these fancy weapons and the like are just big boys’ toys. Let the big boy grow to a man, a family man and realize that the whole world is your family. Stir competition in research and development. Let the military evolve let them lead the way to show us how we can live forever for a change. The past 2000 years these guys have been showing us how to kill. I think by now we know how they really can kill but this is just one side of the coin. I stand here in front of you and say I want to see the other side of the coin. Show me how you can extend life. Show me how you can close wounds your dagger has made. Show me how you can close the hole your bullet left on the forehead of another. Show me how you can raise the 500 000 women and kids who have died. Show me how you can make even better roads than the ones you blew up. Show me how you can build missiles that can pick up the people you killed. In other words, can your missiles that sunk the people in the ground also make them fly to another place? Show me how your mother of all bombs can recreate new people through birth or whatever. Can you swear not to kill innocent women and children? It’s time we see the reverse of everything you do. If you have been killing can you make or create life? Show us something we don’t know. Evolve or face closure. I am not saying that the military is now a thing of the past. I am saying evolve and exist remain killing then conflict with our new laws and rules and face the consequences. Our message is that strive for advanced technological advancement never witnessed before at fast rates than now. More resources towards things that really matter. I know we will have problems having people listening to us simply because for some they have everything to lose because killing innocent women and children is what they know best something we will vehemently defeat.

We will encourage competition between everyone; businesses, local governments, institutions, individuals, etc. We will reward talent and smart-hard-working and those investing in things that matter get extra funding for money we will set aside. We need personal fast planes. Establish global networks. We will create one global identity one global passport for everyone which you can use worldwide. No boundaries no restrictions in the New World. We will create effective transport networks global in partnerships with other countries, but Tomorrow’s World Order will oversee the project and create and allocating funds so that progress is a fact and there is someone to make sure that everything goes according to plans. We as Tomorrow’s World Order are not confined to a certain country. We will establish offices in every country and the whole globe shall be one like a single-family. I argued at the beginning of this chapter that a family is the nearest we can have to the New World nevertheless on a small scale. The family has all the characteristics of the New World. They work together for the betterment of the family unit. There is stiff competition don’t get me wrong there are fights too but not just empty cowardice fights these are fruitful fights that bring results and only add to the value of the family. Competition in the family is the same competition we will want to see. Everyone working their own way trying hard any way they could to be the best the bright sibling, etc. I explained the obstacles we have in real-life in trying to recreate the family unit on a nation or global scale. I had an idea earlier own getting everyone chipped and connected through that chip as a digital nerve or whatever you want to call it so that that nerve acts the same way as the family blood. If people know they have the same blood, they work together for the betterment of everyone. Family blood removes jealous, evil thinking and all negative feelings. We would not even contemplate spending dosh on weapons. So maybe I should patent this idea to get a chip that will be implanted and act as blood or family DNA. I know you might be saying you start sounding like today’s leaders. Trust me, they are not like me. Their intentions are short-term just for their career 4 to 8 years that’s it whatever happens while my dreams will last through future generations. I am not changing countries etc. no. The only way I will see these changes is to incorporate my vision into their long-term plans. This is a global movement rather than a political party. My plans are for everyone regardless of color, genetic heritage, creed, social standing, gender, etc.

Trust me there are no terrorists who will come up with similar plans to better humanity. We have potential as ‘a people’, and it is a sad fact that we would rather waste precious resources on fanciful boys’ toys than with things that matter. We can do better that is a fact. We have potential and we can do much better as ‘a people’, but we need to work together and not be afraid of change. We should be very dynamic to be flexible. In my dream, the globe is like just that big family house you grew up in. Picture that and you have all the answers. Imagine going to your brother’s room anytime and getting kicked out for entering without knocking. Remember going back to his room only to be screamed at when you find his girlfriend there with him. No matter how many times you have just entered uninvited he will never close the door forever. It’s a matter of going there at the right time. Imagine all gathering in the sitting lounge talking until the next morning making plans etc. Imagine your brother coming home unannounced with his car raving outside waking up everyone? Imagine sometimes contributing to a barbecue outside. Imagine all painting the house or doing gardening or all buying new furniture for the house? This is not socialism because it’s still one man for himself TWO for us all. There is still competition and individuality. Each sibling can save his or her money building his or her own family on the side. So, all this talk of socialism. We can do better. We are wasting resources and can work at above optimal. I will create the conditions and new laws so that it is a smooth move to another stage. So, let’s work together. If you are all prepared to change so be it but if not, then I am afraid to say we can’t revert to the old ways. I can’t seem to stress this enough. We are not going to let you take us down with you. If you can’t stop, we will stop you.

So, a Visionary; a New World Order leader or a Terrorist you decide. I know these people might want to include me on their Colony Collapse Strategy list and try to link this to terrorism, b

Take care of your mental health with our licensed counselors. We offer individual and group therapy sessions to help you overcome anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges.

*A new beginning. Appoint new fresh thinking leaders.

*Establish and implement new laws. A one world.

The New World is a stage where people are advanced in that they have enough knowledge and self-esteem to fight for what they want on their own. At this stage, they are aware of most of the tricks being played on them right now in the name of protection, etc. where they are held to ransom and where viruses are loaded on them in the name of protection or in the name if eugenics or population control. In the New World, these people are well educated and knowledgeable that they would rather sue whoever is doing this to them than to receive handouts so that some evil people can have a job. What is happening now will never happen in the New World without someone dragged to court. In the New World, high self-esteem will drive people mad when they discover that the governments or institutions are using digital remotely operated weapons to age them faster. They will never agree to be guinea pigs to be experimented on like what is happening now. Current governments make all kinds of stuff, bio-engineered or digital and recently cyber agents and test these on people as watermarks, etc. deliberately reducing the life span and quality of life all which conflicts with our first laws. People will never be tricked that they are given a dodgy face to protect someone else or as a way of communicating or teaching someone something. People will be clever enough to realize that all this is illegal and all they must do is take all these culprits to court or take the law into their own hands simply because whatever they are loaded with will never be reversible, a death sentence and currently on death row. It’s inhuman and an act that makes one be recognized as Hostis Humani Generis. People in the New World have courage and are willing to work hard and smarter and all these issues where people are lazy and must be given the so-called protection literally loaded with viruses for being lazy in return for handouts is a thing of the past. These governments who pretend to help their citizens in the name of protection while testing viruses on them are not only breaking the law. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. Risk of death by the assassin if found guilty by the courts in the New World. We can’t let governments make viruses on our watch and test these on their people in the name of protection. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. Any watermarks in the form of viruses be it digital or biological can’t be tolerated in the New World. Most of these governments are exploiting loopholes in the law. They wait until all lifelines to take the issue to court are exhausted or expired, and after that, no one can do anything. The whole institutions and governments then further abuse the victims using these as baits. This is barbaric and we shall be tough with these evils simply because all this protection conflicts with the first rule the right to a healthy peaceful life and the right to self-preserve. Above all, it creates a zombie world with people lacking creativity and innovativeness. In short, it creates dependencies on the main aim of these governments so they hear a lot of thank you and feel better about themselves when in fact people without them can be better people who are very creative who can work to find lasting solutions. How on earth can one have a right to life when he or she is choking with watermarks? It’s very unwise on the part of the victims to allow these teaching hospitals and the doctors treat them like guinea pigs and using them as bait. In the New World people will have advanced knowledge and would be very smart through intensive education not academic but life knowledge through our laws etc. to know that this is wrong. If someone is reducing your life span making everything go faster would you not be angry? I think most people if they were free, would fight, but this is prevalent in countries with dictatorships, monarchies, etc. where people are expected to do whatever for protecting the dictator or monarchy. I am not saying monarchies are bad, but they are not aware that leaders or certain institutions like teaching hospitals and doctors abuse people in their name. They tag all the population putting them on ‘death row’ since the day they are born just to justify protecting the monarchs. This is also true in dictatorship settings as well so it’s not monarchies only. Surprisingly monarchies themselves don’t know that their name or institution is used behind their backs to break all rules. So, I don’t blame them, and we support monarchies and will protect monarchies. The issue is not with the monarchies but governments and institutions who trick their people.

Most of these people are hacked at birth and most don’t even know they are hacked until it’s too late. Regimes that practice this kind of protection of making viruses and loading their people as watermarks to protect their people as in eugenics and the monarchy must be dragged to court. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. The New World is not about making excuses about dictatorships, eugenics, population control, the monarchy or national security at the expense of individual rights. No one has privileges and if it’s true that all these people are suffering because of the dictator, eugenics, political party or the monarchy then whoever is doing this is not good. People should have high self-esteem. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. These people are reducing the life of their people and that of foreigners as well.

No government or country shall abuse its own people by making viruses and loading their people as watermarks to protect important people or vulnerable people or in the name of eugenics, nor security nor population control. Making of any kind of watermarks-based viruses be it digital or cyber are illegal and continuing to do this when outlawed will result in the leaders being dragged to court. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. Viruses and watermarks reduce lifespan and the quality of life and treating people like cattle being stamped before a sale will never be tolerated. All kinds of protection are outlawed simply because they are prone to abuse and rely on a principle of scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours something that can’t be associated with any governments nor institutions and people in a position of trust for that matter simply because most of the people involved are children and the vulnerable women.  It is true to say that these governments deliberately starve their people reducing circulating income, making the benefit system very strict, deliberately so that people will ‘scratch’ their backs e.g. children used to trap all untagged foreigners or used as prostitutes so as to trap the untagged so as to bring them in the ‘system’. I remind you that the use of hunger or poverty is a form of torture as in the five techniques of torture and therefore an international crime. This increases cases of child prostitutes as the children are used as bait putting innocent kids in danger if that means closing all these useless teaching hospitals and other government institutions so be it. Very stiff punishments simply because these people are in a position of trust. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent applies here. 

There shall never be time limits to take a case to the court that involves abuse by people in a position of trust like doctors, government institutions or teaching hospitals. All cases can be brought to court at any given time by the victim or his or her representatives and it shall be free the institutions, governments, hospitals, etc. accused must pay for all court fees. The current system encourages abuse after abuse by doctors and hospitals. To make things worse, the other government institutions then try to further abuse to silence the victim. The victim has no way of complaining. The hospitals won’t look at the case after a certain time people even if you have compelling evidence. The High Court is very expensive mind you most of the victims have no source of income they are targeted with all governments making sure they only get amounts they set influencing managers, other income sources, etc. as all are illegally tagged. The abuse by the doctors involves the implantation of GPS and devices they operate remotely. The first six months when the victim has a lifeline to take the hospital to court the institutions work very hard to make sure that the person will never save enough money to take them to the High Court. The High Court fees start at   $600. Commands are from the top and everyone will frame and do all the dirty tricks to make sure you can’t bring a successful case to the court. The whole governments are corrupt, abusive and trickery. Tricking their people into modern-day slavery. All this gives jobs to teaching hospitals and other institutions at the expense of innocent victims who are tortured using the implants that they will end up on drugs giving all the institutions alibis and jobs. This can’t be tolerated these people are worse than the pirates and the slave trader before them. It can’t be tolerated. The laws must be changed. The whole system encourages abuse by people in power.

A hacker shall be treated as a pirate or slave trader. Governments hacking all their people are breaking the law. How on earth can a government load its people with radiation-emitting devices with GPS functions and operated remotely? Its genocide and can’t be tolerated. No governments shall be permitted to implant deliberately or indirectly secretly or otherwise for any reason. There shall never be any justification for such abuse. National security, dictatorship, eugenics, protection of the monarchy, immigration or other reasons must never override the right to life so these excuses will never exempt anyone from being punished for that. The teaching evil hospitals etc. a thing of the past as they are illegally operated because they are like assassins and drug lords taking everything in their own hands. How can those looking for organs also be responsible for the ‘potential-donors’ or own heroin fields to be prescribed to potential victims and above all be allowed to illegally implant torture medical devices? Speaking of grooming and cultivating for a benefit or profit. The so-called personal motive. Life must be respected.  They encourage assassinations of the head of the house in order to recruit people they will teach. Their main motives are to use these orphans as bait so that they trap more people who they tag. The hospitals through the ambulances must help and trick everyone getting tagged and implanted with a GPS. Using these orphans as bait involves them being prostitutes and after using these orphans, they dispose of them by torturing them through the device implanted at birth, or loaded with watermarks so they are hooked on drugs and in the end are given prescription heroin from the hospital-owned fields. There is a need to overhaul or get rid of the current health system reduce ambulances, sack most of these and with the money to fight poverty. Ever heard the saying that too many chiefs with a few Indians? Applies here. Too much wastage. There must be a noise reduction law to ban sirens as sirens are abused and used to intimidate and frighten people. This is done to ‘open them’ trying to trick them or weaken their system so that they are easily attacked. In the digital world, this makes sense. A lot to learn here.  Bear in mind these institutions were created in war times and they in vainly recreate war scenes to remain viable. This reduces the quality of life of the locals driving the locals crazy. 

CHAPTER THIRTEEN

*A New World. 

*A new beginning. 

*But there is a lot to be done.

*What have we achieved and what year is it? 

Our plan is to achieve most of our goals by a certain date. New laws will make this a smooth process. Our aims are to solve all of today’s global issues with little effort.

Global democracy by a certain date. I think the new laws and banning of wars and weapons together with evolving the military will solve most of the problems dealing with democracy. This must be globally developed or developing countries there are no excuses. All loopholes to be closed and violators to be punished with swift justice.

I think when the new laws take effect as self-esteem of everyone increases and people start realizing that there is more to life than worshipping others then and there will people reject any form of colonization. I think it will be irresponsible for former colonial powers to hang on to countries and land obtained by force during the colonial period. New laws to make it illegal to keep land and countries obtained by force and unfairly. It’s like stealing; to avoid any criminal proceedings former colonial powers will be given a time period, to return land deemed by all to have been taken unfairly or can sell it back at a fair price to recover some costs. Open to negotiations. 

New laws to force former colonial powers to be responsible for the removal of watermarks and any form of claiming possession e.g. through the use of landmines, etc. The colonial powers must be given a timeline to remove all landmines at their own cost before handing over land or countries back to the rightful owners. Compensation for damage caused using landmines and any deaths due to landmines etc. will result in criminal charges brought against the former colonial powers effective from the day the landmines were planted. The number of deaths if more than a certain number more charges will be brought on top of that if it can be proven that planting of these landmines was without empathy for the people affected therefore a lack of empathy laws to be used. I raised the issue earlier on that some people do what they do simply because those whoever dies are not related to them by ‘background’ and as such we will assess if it is just or not. The use of cruel tools to claim possession will cost anyone their lives. We look at a notion often argued that evil can only breed evil. It’s true to say, for example, that kids are influenced by their parents and, in most cases, will do and follow the same principles of their parents. In most cases, it is difficult to divert from the principles of their parents and will continue the same legacy.

A point related to the above point to see global decolonization is the fact that some countries might want to cling to former colonies through secret slavery where people are forced indirectly to obey some acts against their will for fear of being further abused. Very stiff punishment regarding anything to do with secret slavery or any unfair practices that have slavery or other forms of human degradation. There are no justifications whatsoever. I know in some countries they abuse people amounting to degrading treatment as part of initiation or protection. Be warned these rituals originated from a time when no one had human rights so listen to me and stop! It will cost you your life. Ask yourself when the rituals or protection of this nature first came into effect if more than a half a century ago stop automatically you are breaking the law. Change or we will change you. Time and duration must be considered as well. A ritual that can be done a few times might be okay as the same ritual done over decades becomes gross abuse. So be careful to check time limits. Some acts leave permanent emotional and physical scars over a long period. Be warned because what might seem harmless over time can amount to a serious crime. To be on the right side of the law sit down and assess all the practices that might have issues with the new laws and ask yourself when these laws or rituals were created and assess if there were any human rights? How were the human rights issues at that time and check if they observe the first rules or laws; the rights to life and to self-preserve and to a great quality of life? If not, then you are breaking our laws to change immediately. These practices in most cases were formulated to weaken people so that they are abused or perform certain favors. You might not know that, or things might have changed but understand the underlying principles. All these rituals are meant to destroy a person’s self-esteem and we can’t tolerate that because like I have said our goal is to boost self-esteem to the highest levels ever or even to break the barrier. So be warned. Most practices are to weaken so that the victim will obey say sexual favors etc. It’s like calling a person derogating names to reduce them so that one can get them when they are ‘cheap’ or load them with watermarks so that no one else will touch them therefore lowering their value by eliminating competition. This happening to humans in the New World? Hell no, no, no watch it. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent.

You will be shocked that some governments even developed ones are using food and essentials like water as a weapon to control their population. Food is used as a tool to command people. We will fight for the provision of basic rights globally first. Our strategy will make it illegal to override the first laws in favor of policies that make them starve their people. Above all, starving and intimidating your people is a form of torture and damn right torture is banned by international laws.

I think most of our policies might be indirect but will have a huge impact on climate. Banning of weapons, wars, changing how the military work, banning of all fossil fuel consuming vehicles, machinery, and buildings, etc. will help tackle climate change. Replacement of fossil fuels with cleaner ones, electricity solar, etc. Replacing all-metal vehicles with other ones made of recyclable material toughened fiber, etc. Research and development of better sources of energy. I think all these summits on climate change are a joke. You say zero-carbon reduction by 2020 and don’t ban but increase fossil fuel consumption as oil-related vehicle production continues to increase etc. That’s pathetic.

I think most of the institutions today are useless and are there only for cosmetics reasons i.e. to make the world look better and not actually be better and for other reasons which I will discuss at the end of the book. They are there to make it look like they are doing something, but the truth is that there are there just to create jobs compete with the world’s poorest for resources. The world is in a state it is simply because you are there you bastard’s competition with the poor. If you were not there, then we would not have all these problems. This is a troubling truth. Most encourage poverty to justify their presence. We are going around this and ban some of these institutions. I think for most of these people who talk about human rights they don’t even know what it means. There are so many human rights organizations in the world, and we have so many issues still problems, yet these institutions have been there for decades. I will make new laws that evaluate the effectiveness of these institutions and close some that might be causing some problems we have.

The reason why I am against useless institutions is the fact that they put lives at risk. People when they see the number of institutions and organizations that claim to offer help, they can get the belief that there is help there when most are just paper pushers with no ways of helping at all. I think most are for ‘cosmetics purposes’ only put there by the very people we are saying are breaking our laws and other international laws to keep people quiet.

I argued above that it is a common strategy of some developed countries to create lucrative jobs at the expense of the poor. It can be argued that developed countries for example might create a problem through say invading a country and planting landmines so to render the land useless. After some time when the landmines have done some real damage through deaths and maiming then the land is devalued. Once that happens, they then send their multi-national companies or other branches like the Red Cross to remove the landmines at exorbitant prices thereby creating jobs and lucrative markets landmines can be removed at 1000 times the cost of planting. I will reiterate here that laws to assess for a lack of empathy aggravated decisions will be done and if it can be proven that the decisions if maliciously given without due regard to life. Our aim is to be fair and to deal with evil according to law.

It will be a law that crimes that are considered as cruel are to be assessed if they can be said to have lacked the empathy element. I think this is a great step towards equality, reconciliation and rebuilding the world. This will act as a deterrent to future crimes and will make people think again before committing crimes. Again, if a person is breathing by any means through a machine or not has to be held accountable for any crimes committed since the day that person was born.

I think I personally learned this the hard way. Imagine a kid making a silly mistake that ended up costing his life at 17 years old. I think this is a debated subject, but it might be wise to increase the age of responsibility. Open for debate.

A very sensitive area but one that we have sure plans. Our current system has gone bonkers. It’s humanity’s inferiority to do what is going on globally with the health sector. I personally think it’s time we take a turn for good. The current system is against all our laws and not only conflicts with our first rule but contradicts our laws so we can’t work with this obsolete system. Full stop. There is no negotiation at all. Crash the whole thing to the ground with immediate effect and replace most. The current people if not lazy then they are very complacent and if I have my way drag all to court. How on earth can you recreate the worst time in mankind’s history? How on earth can an institution trusted with the health of everyone be making and using viruses be it biological, digital or cyber ones just to create jobs by recreating the worst epidemics and the war conditions to justify existence? I mentioned above that the current health system globally is obsolete and must be replaced with immediate effect. The health system was created during the war or soon after and as such they try to recreate those conditions so that they are viable and justifies the huge budgets. Can someone tell me that life expectancy and the health of global nations is the same as seventy years ago? Not the same obvious so would you not expect the health sector to change? I know this for a fact that the health sector especially the hospitals have diversified taking other roles which were currently not for them.

1.   The hospitals in other countries now compete with killing agencies like the CIA. In some countries have become the vehicles of the death penalty themselves caring out the executions taking things into their own hands. The sad side is that these hospitals or the health sector target fathers who they regard as weak who they ‘assassinate’ as most are illegally chipped at birth and they can’t complain because all court lifelines had expired by the time they discover that they have a needle electrode up their ass by then it will be too late already marked for death at birth. Why one might ask? So that these institutions look after the orphans through teaching hospitals who run day by day robbing banks to reward orphans who obey and listen but punish those who refuse. That brings me to the use of torture.

2.   They practice torture.

You will be shocked to know that our public health competes with gangsters for heroin customers and they even have their own heroin fields. To make things worse, they implant chips that are remotely operated to all children at birth which they later remotely operate torturing the orphans as behavioral change therapy. Just imagine how bad it can be if no one knows and believes that these kids are being chipped at birth and imagine the kind of torture when no one can prove that they are chipped? Do you also know that the same hospitals prescribe heroin? I am 100 percent against everything our public health system stands for. They are going for short cuts kill rather than create.

3.   They are involved in child grooming.

The orphans of dead fathers are looked after by the hospitals who take over as guardians providing for the orphans teaching them to bet on say horse racing where they have the control as horses can be chipped to control energy levels. In return, they link through the chips to potential buyers’ or people who might take them as wives, or they might end up as prostitutes being tortured and told to go and meet someone the hospitals might want to get tagged. So, in fact, it’s the hospitals that are training prostitutes to use as bait. We know agencies like the CIA used the same techniques to get to some people including politicians, etc. If they refuse these kids are tortured until they are taking their heroin as a prescription. In the end, they are disposed of to keep the whole issue a secret.

4.   The public health sectors have become the worst hackers. You will be shocked that the hospitals use James Bond gadgets to spy on everyone globally. To make things worse, they breach trademarks or patents rights by stealing the person’s designs and falsely claim to be behind that person’s success but what they are doing is using a video or screen sender linked to a chip implanted at birth to spy on everyone and then follow those who might be working on something. What they do is use the screen sender to monitor whatever you do, what you watch or who you call on your phone. Behind your back then stab you in the back blocking your meetings or clients until you accept that they are helping and in this case, they damage something on your body, eye or make you age faster as a mark that you belong to their ‘cult’ or whatever. Gross breach of human rights. A hacker is as bad as a slave trader Hostis Humani Generis and as such an enemy of what we stand for.

5.   Hacking and implanting chips at birth etc. all is against what we stand for. There are no justifications whatsoever simply because all these gadgets, chips, etc. are operated remotely and have GPS functions that mean they use radiation and other dangerous waves. All this is against the first rule and all reduce quality of life amounting to gross abuse. Imagine someone in a position of trust with a joystick in the hand stimulating the genitals of your wife or child for that matter? Gross abuse. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent is appropriate here because it’s either kill or be killed in the end because the goal of a hacker is to change, modify, damage and in the end cause malfunction of an otherwise healthy system or body. Against the first rule; the right to life. How can you have a life when it’s in someone’s hands and in most cases someone who despises you? Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. Track and trace; new roles of our military or organizations like NATO as an ‘evolving task’.

6.   Our public health is involved in eugenic thinking. Okay, I am not against the development of perfect genes but if you are the ones causing the bad ones in the first place, then it becomes a different issue. The chips implanted to all people in developed countries can be remotely operated and be augmented by further needle electrodes or diodes to stimulate nerves in electromagnetic stimulation and tampering to or obstruct many bodily functions like egg production. They are deliberately causing genetic defects to create more jobs and justify chipping kids at birth but remember the chicken or egg scenario here. What came first? Is it the egg or the chicken? If they can influence egg production and if it takes say for argument’s sake four days naturally and if they make your body produce an egg in two days are there chances that the egg might not be ready or deformed or lack something that if fertilized might lead to disability? Take me seriously here. What makes then expects to look at the number of disabilities especially the obvious ethnic population that is obviously chipped at birth as population control in certain countries? I know there are arguments that people like Asians they marry their cousins so say if people with the same genes if they met, they might have a baby thereby increasing the chances of genetic defects. Okay, but could it be the fact that the chipping on population control could be the main problem here. Over history, people married a close relative from the Roman empire why we didn’t have so high cases of disabilities than recently. Not documented? Not good enough reason. Something is going on. Is this another chicken and egg thing?

7.   I think we need new laws around this. We need a clear and transparent system where everyone illegally chipped at birth must be told and give consent and chose to be clean of all chips. There must be investments in the technology that overcomes these issues. There must be machines everywhere that can check if people have been violated by being chipped without consent and are used as bait or abused or their systems tampered with.

8.   Very stiff penalties resulting in death simply because radiation is no friend to humans. It’s irresponsible for the governments concerned and the leaders if they can’t justify these acts must be dragged to court. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. They are no better than a mass murderer, a person who commits genocide, etc.

9.   Laws to ban such practices unless if the person is advised of the risks and agrees. This is no different from slavery and as far as I know, slavery was abolished many years ago. In most cases, this is for population control where the government chooses who to kill and choose when they die.

10.  This is true in countries without the death penalty that everyone is put on ‘death row’ on birth by being secretly chipped and that chip is used to control the life of that person and how he or she will die. Simply because people now live longer, and the government knows the population is old and will do real damage to the balance sheet.

11. Stiff laws to outlaw and ban such practices even criminals do not deserve to be treated this way because you have committed a crime equivalent to murder the day you chipped that kid or person. It will be possible to bring charges against these doctors on self-defense ground in worst case scenarios, but everything must be through the courts. You can justify this on grounds that they are trying to kill you attempted murder from the day they implanted that chip.

12.  It will be a law to kill in self-defense if the person has done an act that violated the first rule; the right to life and to self-preserve so a person can defend himself or herself. Remember this is because that the chips are planted to act as killing weapons through the use of radiation emitted secretly by these chips. So, the doctors are murderers as well who must face the law too.

13. More serious issues regarding the making of digital, cyber or biological weapons for the hospitals to remain viable. You must go to your doctors for digital weapons that might be used on you to drive attendances? To create and use these weapons as they lower quality of life in the long run.

14. Ban all companies making this kind of stuff. Close all universities’ departments involved in producing all these stuffs. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. Drag to court all leaders approving such practices simply because the acts conflict with the first rule they are like murderers.

15.  Involvement in terrorist acts. The command givers and drivers behind this using siren to direct just like a film director. Listen to sirens they coincide with critical points of attacks etc. can’t be a coincident. I discussed this in earlier and later chapters.

16. Yes, you will be shocked that through what the hospitals call protection they are recruiting and training all terrorists we know today from 9/11 hijackers, etc. all chipped with gadgets that are controlled by only people in a position of trust. Yes, the chipping is used to torture pulling eye iris causing great pain and stressing life until the person finds a way-out through revenge. The targets have themselves been put through a grieving stage or tricked into committing a crime then blackmailed to revenge by killing innocent people. Again, care to be taken here ask yourself what came first the chicken or egg because they might argue that they chipped the person because they suspected him or her as a terrorist but maybe they made him or her a terrorist. It’s hard to believe that a person who is chipped like most of the 9/11 attackers can escape the radar of those who have access to these chips. Do you know the teaching hospitals train people to be prepared for say terrorist attacks and what are the chances that on 9/11 we had a group of firefighters rehearsing when the 9/11 attacks occurred to check the firefighters who filmed the first plane hitting the Tower? Check also in UK the 7/7 attacks happened when a group of people were rehearsing as well see the film Loose Change for details.

17. I think the whole system has tarnished once was a respected profession to the lowest of lows. These people are supposed to be trustworthy and honest. Imagine them hacking your items and pretend to be clever and teach you how to run a business when their profession is about wiping the elder’s buttocks. It’s pathetic. It’s bad judgment they are not qualified as managers to run a business. If you want business ideas, you don’t go to teaching hospitals but to managers, universities, etc. Most of the problems we have today are a direct result of this abuse of trust and power. They are not afraid simply because literally, they have a joystick in their hands to control everyone remotely like operating a drone. Imagine the bad aspects of technology? But we shall put new laws and swear by the assassin that he or she will do a great job to clean this mess.

18.  Huge investment in the technology with the military who are used to kill now forced to look for answers as well. Tracking and tracing all kinds of shenanigans.

19. Cyber-attacks by the hospitals as they have access to billions of medical records through these chips. A new threat and a risk to humanity a cyber nuclear electromagnetic attack or bomb can be used to wipe-out everyone with a chip that is all people born after a certain time having their devices switched off some even blinded as the chips can hide the iris in the eye-socket preventing vision. A cyber electromagnetic bomb or attack is a new global challenge. What is happening with humanity is that when we win over certain threats like biological bacteria and viruses, then these people create digital versions taking us back to the beginning? Now we have the same threats but different versions. We start all over again, wasting time and resources when we should be looking for other things to enhance human life.

     Very stiff punishment to these people who would create deadly threats to mankind. To hell with them. Stop funding anyone developing digital threats or other new forms harmful to humans. Open your eyes and see that we are going in circles. In truth, we are still in the medieval period when the black death was killing people only that we have substituted the real pathogens with digital ones, and we are trying to recreate those scenes, so our public health has something to shout about. That’s not just evil but makes these people Hostis Humani Generis people fit to be attacked by all nations without any mercy.

      Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent.

Tomorrow’s World Order will have express authority to finger a country to be ganged-up-on by the whole world if they pose a real threat to everyone’s future. I will have the power after investigating any nation to get it attacked without need to bring the matter to the court simply because a person or country that practices evil at such levels will have people in the courts as well to manipulate and stall progress buying time may be to destroy the whole humanity. We can’t take chances we just need to convince other nations that this is happening and if a certain number concurred, then there is no need to consult that country but to act swiftly. Look what happened to Hitler. No one decided to take him to court because people were afraid that he might kill more before he is stopped and as such, we will do the same. Some chips like I said can threaten the survival of all humanity. Some countries chip everyone in the name of protection to safeguard their way of life. But say in case of an electromagnetic bomb that explodes all chips we might have total wipe-out and human extinction and as such, I think if it can’t be proved otherwise, I think that can automatically make a country or their leaders qualify to be Hostis Humani Generis. Such acts of chipping everyone can result in human extinction who knows what technology brings tomorrow and the fact that this is done secretly raises grave concerns. Here it’s not just laws that need to be enforced I think that can justify isolation of that country on the grounds that it poses a threat to all mankind and as such, all its people who are chipped might be prevented going abroad until investigations prove that these chips are not harmful to others. As the chips can be cyber electromagnetic bombs. A point in relation to the above is the fact that such chips are used as weapons to mobilize anyone who might come near them. This is true as the chips are used to trigger a defensive mechanism that immobilizes others by blinding them as the chips can be used to pull the iris of the eye and hide it in the eye-socket rendering others prone to attacks putting life in danger and as such can be said to conflict with the first rule. Think of a car immobilizer that instantly stops the car. Okay if for safety reasons this can render say an attacker immobilized as he or she is blinded by the chip but what if the chips are used to rob people or trap the whole world all getting blinded so that you are forced to sign your life away in exchange of your sight? If you refuse, then you are killed or forced into slavery or prostitution or to become even a terrorist? Who knows the real intention?

I think our laws represent international law and we will work very hard to make sure there is justice in this world. We are not creating laws that people don’t know about or never heard about. We looked at the common problems and then assessed why we have these problems. We also checked if we have international laws that support these issues. The truth is all our laws are there in international law, but we are rearranging and prioritizing certain fundamental principles, making things that are believed to be the norms now; right to life and self-preservation as priority laws and paramount ones that must be observed first and never overridden. Currently, there are other laws that can easily override these laws and people easily find justifications and get away with that. So, what we have done is to remove these other laws or areas that give people in power reasons to override these laws; the major one is the military, wars and security reasons. We have protected all future and current leaders from persecution when their term in office has ended by removing the need to commit crimes in the name of self-defense. When your term in office has expired, you won’t need to be blackmailed by these teaching hospitals into signing your life away or the life of a close relative no. You can enjoy being a great leader and be remembered as such.

Our aim is to create one globe with no walls or boundaries where there is one dominant currency that works side by side with a country’s own currency to boost wealth and growth to encourage free movement. I think the differences would be the amount of the fee’s countries would like to charge for entry as we would like to make sure that there is some country autonomy left. The only restrictions might be due to the fees payable as we would like to encourage competition as well. I think this is another area open to discussions as it might be good if decided by each country if they know this is the networking and connection era enough of building walls.

Banning weapons globally and wars are great strides towards achieving global peace. I think it is highly correct that we have been talking about global peace for decades and yet we achieved none. So, as Tomorrow’s World Order we have come up with laws that will be observed globally to change the way we do business. The current system crashed years ago, and we just mended it and we are hanging by a thread or was hanging by a thread until now. I think either the whole world wants to create jobs and talk about global peace and security just to push for more salaries or they don’t understand what is needed to achieve global peace and security. I think the world is playing games talking but doing little. I know this other woman said to me that if you solve all the problems, then what are we going to do and how are we going to create jobs or not have anything to talk about. In short, she was saying that things are the way they are because this is the way that works. Newspapers have stories to tell. Every time a picture of a poverty-stricken kid is flashed on the front page the papers sell like hotcakes. United Nations Children Funds [UNICEF] has something to look forward to. The government has something to argue about. Your politicians have reasons to push and campaign for. Globally the world goes around. But if there is no poverty or kid starving, there is no business for the newspaper, the politician, UNICEF, etc. are all deprived. Then again, I said what if we can hear what that child wants for a change? You have been doing this for decades if it’s a novel okay at first it was the best novel, but you have read this novel too many times that now you think you are wasting time. Why not this UNICEF or the newspaper or the politician evolve and start looking for ways to reduce aging? Or to create humans. Surely, we have pressing issues at hand, yet we obsess with things we can easily change without feeling any impact. I think the whole world must evolve and everyone must do what they have never done before because change is coming, we will ban all useless activities and monitor these institutions and recommend other areas that need looking at. It’s not a dictatorship but as I have argued we must use all resources wisely and work at optimal capacity. Read this together with ‘Useless Institutions’ in later chapters.

I think this is an interesting topic because it raises a lot of questions and this makes Tomorrow’s World Order differ from all current institutions like the government and its hospitals and the killing squad and even the New World Order. All these people are advocating for the control of population through a lot of strategies like chipping to be in direct control of deciding how many dies this year and how fast they can age this year to playing God as to go to extreme cases of say vaccinating everyone with viruses that become deadly after say 20 years when the kids immunized will have grown for all to die as a population control. Everyone else is playing God to kill through any means. People are investing $billions in making chips to illegal implants at birth every newborn. To a scientist as technology developers making devices that are easily hidden that can emit harmful radiation or be switched off or exploded like bombs killing everyone. Everyone has lost the plot. The reasons given are that the population is growing at alarming rates and very few are dying. So, we must do something before it’s too late. Yet despite all these alarms we still make weapons. To make things worse, we are becoming friends. Wake up!! It’s contradictory. Make weapons and create enemies this was a strategy used for past centuries and it works because in the end you will be given a chance to check who has the big guns and who can do real damage. I explained throughout that the Allies decided to play it rough and write a list every 20-25 years with potential enemies to wipe-out using the two superpowers Britain and the USA through CIA etc. and to wipe-out the low-level culprits mainly from Africa and other middle eastern countries using the ICC a strategy I have referred to as a Colony Collapse Strategy. At the same time using NATO as the big bodyguard who doesn’t talk but just stands behind the leader of the gang with folded hands to send a clear message that; mishandles the situation with the boss and be beefed. Ever watched the 1980s gangster or mafia movies? The weapons market is saturated and at last, people have realized that it’s better to make friends than being intimidated and threatened all the time. It’s a bargaining era. So, who are your enemies? Who are you still making weapons for? Aliens? Ha-ha, I have heard that trick before. We removed all the alarms that would warn the system of the need to eliminate weapons through world wars to avoid piling. Now humans are going to keep making weapons until one day when friction results in a massive global war that causes human extinction. As recently as 2017 gone we have increased military funding to $1.7 trillion. Where are your enemies? A little friction will cause a Third World War which can result in severe casualties. Wars to be honest they have no winners, if you face heavy casualties as well there is no winning unless your plans like most of these politicians are to reduce the budget bill. Just imagine in one of the wars 60 000 soldiers died in a day. Imagine 60 000 people off your monthly salary bill and maybe two million soldiers off your balance sheet by the time the war ends. Huge savings sad but a fact.

Our new laws will make the military like any other profession where our best have greater chances of enjoying their pension. We will make the military evolve by finding other things to do. This time to enhance life or even to create one with time. I think we have been looking at this the wrong way, otherwise, we could have had answers by now as it has been decades now.  Unless like that lady the reason is to run around the whole day playing crocodile-smile and then go home and relax hoping for another running around day at work and a fat salary at the end of the month.  Why not? Who cares? They come and go. Someone might suggest. I think we can change for the better and create stress-free jobs that reduce aging rates and make people feel good about themselves doing something beneficial rather than pretending.  That takes me to the next point.

I personally think that mankind has chosen what he calls the easy approach. Stall and waste time pretend, go with the flow, running around the whole day and then pretend everything is okay after stressing about the issue. Most would prefer to make a loud noise to look as if they are doing great; working hard. What you don’t realize is that all the time you are running around pretending to work and solving the issues so that you keep your job etc. maybe you are doing real damage to your personal health. Stress levels reduces life span, makes one age very fast, you wrinkly faster, your sex life might not be great, your relationships might not be so good because your partner might not tell if you are pretending or not because you have perfected the art so good, but deep down you might be reducing your own quality of life. I have worked for a company where the boss would let you decide what to do in terms of your approach to work. Work to deadlines, smarter and faster and lose on overtime or whine and delay orders and accumulate a lot of overtime to match the boss’s salary. I chose for the deadline, fewer hours and less salary as there is no overtime. My friend went with the crying game, overstretching game and delaying tactic to accumulate over time. Okay initially he had more money, but he had to work very long hours, missing on social life and stressful all the time although it was in pretense with time, he ended up bitching about everything else because it made him money. In the long run, I had a promotion and my salary raised and got more for the same fewer hours and I had a great life, felt good, looked great as well and felt valued by the company. This is the kind of approach we will encourage in the future.

Life is not about money although we need money to live. In the end, humans will not work somehow, we will spend time talking and debating life issues while still earning very high. This is the task for everyone today. Find a way we can never go to work again but spend time learning about life or enjoying life or creating life or visiting other planets ourselves. In the coming years maybe, robots will do work for us. Or we are all going to be putting money in investment funds or something new that can create more money for us. So, let’s start thinking about the future as work-less. So, it all adds up.  This is one other reason why I think that the current public health system is dodgy. In the scenario above of the whining guy what he doesn’t know is that these companies make deals with hospitals to buy digital weapons. This is what these people don’t know.  For everything you do the manager who as I said is loaded with all kinds of digital junk by the hospital will load you each time you do something that even the manager would not do. These digital weapons range from wrinkle making agents to butt-poking-agents. I told you that almost everyone in developed countries is chipped at birth. The guy in the scenario above might start to notice that he will be wrinkling faster than normal and since he has given the manager an alibi of stressing over everything, the manager can load him with an agent that acts as a catalyst and speed up the process. In most cases, these managers calculate the value of work done and then estimate the time it can take to do that order. If you exceed that time by a wider marginal, then you are technically stealing from the company. The more you work there the greater the junk stuff loaded into you.  Okay ideally in other countries you can easily go to doctors some can easily remove these in return for boosting attendance rates but in some countries, you will slowly be bought by the hospital there and be put on ‘death row’ because they are like watermarks. You exceeded the time it reasonably take, so the manager decided you stole the money because the value of work does not match the value put into the company and in most cases for a company to reduce costs and make a profit you must meet deadlines and send perfect orders otherwise errors all the time will cost the buyer or customer in terms of delay in the long run the company can go out of business. So, these managers sell you to the hospital. They load you with stuff only the hospital can remove. You look at your friends and yourself you see real changes. So, okay you might have got a lot of money unjustly but it’s like exchanging with your life because the manager does not want lazy people you are a cost to a company you are better dead not just sacked because you will do the same to the next manager. Your quality of life will be poor in the long run filled with regrets and these managers won’t tell you they are also being blackmailed by the teaching hospitals. So, you think you are clever?

Okay, so a comprehensive approach will educate people to choose what is right. Our goals will help everyone decide what is best for you as the world we live in is full of evil people it might take time to get rid of all evil so be educated and assess what is right for you. Life or money? It is these small things that add up in the end. Remember our goals; first, it’s the right to life and to self-preserve and it’s not just life but the best quality life. We will work hard to ban such situations where managers are loaded by the hospital with all kinds of gear.

We are not trying to change the governments but we aim to make being President or Prime Minister the best thing to do with everyone aspiring to be one as our laws and policies will guide you with best guiding notes and remove all the unnecessary clutter and cumbersome decision-making process. Remove any risks associated with the Presidency or Prime Ministerial roles. Make the law clearer and remove any ambiguity and the need to press nuclear buttons and leave it to us with no affiliation to parties or need not the votes of the people. I think we will at some point when things get clearer act as overseers and enforcers. I can tell you that institutions like the UN etc. are therefore cosmetics and as killing machines to eliminate opponents on the 20-year lists to perpetuate the Allies dominance of power and to rule out global wars without stopping illegal invasions and maintain the status quo where innocent women and children die needlessly. Nothing to do with solving the issues they claim to solve. Mind you they have been in existence for seventy years the average lifespan of an adult in other countries, yet problems are becoming worse hence the rise of Tomorrow’s World Order. I say all you old forks  [the UN, NATO, ICC, etc. now seventy old pensioners [no offense to pensioners in general] get your pensions [assuming they are old people now old and obsolete] and get out of my way I have a job to do your time is over! The UN was to stop the war, yet its core founders are at the forefront of wars. the war in Iraq where the UN failed to stop the invasion and recent attacks of Syria by the UK, USA, and France still the UN did not prevent it, but we will change the way things are done. Mark my words. Tomorrow’s World Order as a global leader does not obsess on who is running the individual countries if you observe our laws and all international laws. We are champions of good governance everywhere.

Someone asked me about government control. He said look at you. You are doing the same as the current system dictating; don’t do this and don’t do that. I said it’s not the same. Who on earth right now do not know that it’s wrong to kill women and children for whatever reason? Who on earth does not know that life is more important than anything else and as such must be prioritized? Who on earth does not know that weapons destroy lives and it’s a waste of resources channeling $1,7 trillion on the military? My main point is that all these countries are just bitching about bloody cowards grouping into massive cults and assassinating opponents cowardly. World War Three would be better. Destruction of the things we don’t need. The perfect way to give these boys to tests their toys, safe reduction of popula

Our health coaches provide personalized guidance and support to help you achieve your health goals. Whether you want to lose weight, manage a chronic condition, or simply live a healthier lifestyle, we're here to help.

*One World One People.

 I have dealt with this topic in detail above but mainly in reference to developed countries and globally in general and in this chapter, I would like to look mainly at the Middle East, Africa and other areas like Eastern Europe and globally as a whole. This is because we have issues that are less witnessed in other countries, mainly the developed countries. This is in relation to religion and suicide bombers or attacks. I argued that what the future holds is a stage when the earth will be so good to equal whatever people say is what heaven is like. My belief is that humanity must keep on developing and evolving changing the way you do things until you reach a certain level of understanding. I think religion must play a major part in alleviating the issues we have today.

Religion I think has a role to play if it evolves as well. Just like our current system that dates to centuries ago. What was effective and believed at that time can’t still be the same twenty centuries later?  Evolution in terms of adapting is a fundamental principle that keeps everything relevant and alive. I have argued in earlier chapters that what God or the creator whoever you believe in, wanted was not for humans to die and go to heaven and get-crash that is arrived uninvited in his kingdom. Godlike I said is the omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscience and as such does not need mankind to die and go to heaven and live ever after. I know this is my major difference with modern-day thinking in religious circles. Why on earth would God who only created man out of boredom and not as a necessity as religion want to portray it need men for? God has everything he wants and does not rely on men nor does he need men to worship him. I personally believe that God tasked himself to see if he can create mankind who will follow and evolve to become himself and as such to rule the earth just like he rules the heaven and the whole world. Something I have referred to as God’s Dilemma. He kind of thought of creating mankind to take charge of the earth as a small god who will evolve to one day have a full understanding of how the world works and one day acquire such knowledge to know what is good and evil. Not just that but also to eat the fruits of the tree of life and live forever just like the gods. So God or Allah or whoever you want to call who created you created mankind and set up challenges to complete and puzzles to solve and if they do, they will evolve and understand the next stage so on until they are so full of knowledge and understanding that they will become ‘small gods’ and run earth as God runs the heaven and the whole world as in running a company that is managing. I used religion also to argue that the current understanding of the bible or the Quran is biased and flawed.

Genesis 3v22

22Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil. And now, lest he reaches out his hand and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever…” 

I use religion to argue my point that mankind is one day expected to evolve and mature enough to understand that we have to think beyond the box to be able to think like creators and as such it’s mandatory for us to evolve and know beyond what we know today about good and evil. So, to be able to live forever, it’s not just a matter of knowing. Knowing alone is inadequate for we must reach out and go that extra mile researching about life and why people die and then find answers symbolized by eating once that is done then and then can we defeat death and live forever just like the gods. We must understand by investing in research and development and find all life answers asking questions about life and accept that we must overcome or solve something that stops us aging or dying early so one day we graduate and live forever like the gods.

So, I will put in point form what is expected of us.

1>  God created earth first and put puzzles and obstacles and problems that work against mankind as a challenge to see if mankind will be like him one day. 

2>  God created mankind not because he needed mankind or rely on him or because he wanted to be worshiped. No point for all that simply because he owns the whole world and can easily make stones worship him if he needed it. 

3>  So why he created mankind? He is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscience, meaning he is the almighty and powerful and does not need humans for his existence. He challenged himself to see if he can create a human being or people who will evolve one day to become him.; God’s Dilemma just like we work hard to see if we can make robots as clever as us; Man’s Dilemma. It’s true also to point here that he created the world with a good side and a bad side and hoped that mankind will choose what they think is good for them and see if they chose the right direction to take. His idea is just to let mankind choose for themselves, so they gain an understanding of what is good or evil. 

4>  It’s like a challenge there is a reward at the end. It’s not just a challenge per se there are time limits as well. This is where I come in. My point is that we have lived very comfortably in this phase the defense stage as we are simply sacrificing other important events and even though our lives are perfect by human stands, it’s because we are not evolving or advancing as we might be expected to but just wasting precious resources and time.  Everyone when you say we are behind schedule looks at you and kind of suggesting that this is not the case. Okay, we have everything everyone seems happy. This is the best we can achieve they might argue and further, they can say we can’t solve all the world problems and we can’t make everyone happy. True that’s correct but my point is we are comfortable because we are not sacrificing and evolving doing something we must be doing. This means we are technically stuck in the defensive stage which is a failure because we can do better. If we are to sacrifice, then we can see that we are not working at our optimal or moving up the ladder as we should. It’s not just enough staying in one stage for centuries like what we are doing.

5>  I looked at this as a challenging game that is timed. Okay, you might be in one stage, but time will run out and the game will be over. Just like that we are in the defensive stage and have been here as far as back as the early man’s days. So, God challenged himself to see if he can create people who can be as smart as him but as far as the story goes it’s not the situation. God is not happy with himself [my own opinion] because even though he is the greatest the omnipotent, omnipresence and omniscience he is not able to create a god or gods who live on earth. All he can do is create humans and as far as he knows humans lack the ability to think and solve puzzles like him and so far it’s a daunting task that mankind no matter how he can do will never be as good as him to stand on his own two legs and run [as in a business or company] earth just like he does with the heaven.

6>  I think a perfect example is the case of humans trying to make robots who are as clever as them. I know just like God humans are frustrated because no matter what they are doing they are unable to create robots that good that one day they will be as clever as humans and be wise and one day to understand life as we know it and as such to be able to run a part of earth as we run to earth as humans. We as humans just like God we wish that these robots will understand everything about humans so that one day we can give them a task and their own separate earth as we humans run to earth. Just like God, we have set up a task for the robots to evolve so that in the end they are just like humans thinking the same way and acting the same way so that they can run earth. Just the way God views humanity, we have been stuck in the defensive stages concerned with defending ourselves instead of developing and understanding other things. For the past two thousand years, we have been stuck in defense. The robots only know how to make weapons to protect themselves. Everything about them is to do with making guns and mobilizing the military. But we have removed all kinds of threats and proved that aliens don’t exist and the dinosaurs which were threats are extinct so why are these robots so concerned with defense when they can be doing other things or even making other robots to teach as well or work for them? So, God even though removing some obstacles by making our threats extinct he realized mankind is slow or very fearful or the other reason lazy and evil-minded that he would kill to remain in this stage than to think about creating and moving to the next stage. This is true. Our mind when faced with a problem our first reaction is asking how we can kill to reduce numbers or solve the problems. The likely scenario.

7> We have too many people and the land in the future is not able to sustain the people what shall we do?

*Make viruses and kill some.

*Increase military budget make very destructive weapons.

*Starve some idea adopted by Hitler put them in concentration camps where no food leads to disease, the overcrowding to outbreaks, and because of outbreaks mass deaths and when that happens the population is reduced.

*Deliberately avoid providing basic needs like food always make these things scarce, so there are diseases that further kill people in the long run that reduces the population.

*Instead increase other budgets like the military and other areas that cause an imbalance that can trigger reactions and situations for conflicts that in the end we can go to war and reduce the number of people through weapons.

* Deliberately violate all human rights take your enemies and put them in Guantanamo if people don’t comply then we have chances of going to a war that will result in population reduction.

* Make WMDs in the name of medical records and illegally tag every child at birth and put the whole country on death row. Take the bull by the horns don’t leave anything to chance.

* Make the most destructive bomb and use it so that effects last forever and still have deaths for years.

I think you are familiar with all the points above but not with the following points that make our core focus.

      Stop weapons manufacturing globally and reduce military budgets.

      Channel all the money in critical areas like research and development even to provide food for most, etc.

      Find ways of stopping people aging and dying

      Increase infrastructure, etc.

      Ban making of all viruses, bio, digital or cyber ones

      Avoid overcrowding and improve facilities, etc.

      Make it illegal to kill anyone's enemies or not life matters.

      Priorities life and its self-preservation

      Improve networking and communications and increase research and development budgets

So, the new approach the one in this book is that of doing everything differently altogether. It’s like asking the military and soldiers how they can do the opposite of what they do? How can you create life instead of taking life? How can you close bullet wounds instead of killing? How can you build network infrastructure you normally destroy? etc. It’s a new way of thinking now using the current system like the military to come up with solutions in a way making these institutions evolve to understand how to negotiate and get involved in dialogs etc. It’s easy talking to a machine; a gun, a missile, a virus, a landmine, a watermark, a nuclear bomb, etc. but can you talk to people and how are your skills, etc. Anyone can talk to a gun asking it to kill etc. but can you negotiate and turn a sceptic into a lover, or you will simply increase the hatred. What are your people’s skills? Do you have the brains yourself to understand humanity as a whole or just another idiot thinking within the box? Or you are good at just creating enemies and harden their hearts? Just like we humans create robots who must receive inputs all the time. The challenge is to create clever robots that can see life as we see it and change to move to the next stage.

I ask you a question and would like an honest answer.

Do you think humans will ever create robots that can think and act like us humans? Honestly?

This is the same challenge God set aside to see if humans will ever be as smart as him and act just like him so that one-day mankind will run the earth just like he runs the heaven and the whole world? Just like us with robots God expected mankind to solve the life puzzles and evolve and be as smart as him so that we develop through the stages instead of spending $billions making things that makes sceptics keep doubting or stir others to be skeptical can you turn sceptics into lovers and make everyone love too. I mentioned above that the wars were like warning alarms e.g. fire alarms to indicate the best time to move to the next stage. What humans did instead was to disable the wars which acted as these alarms through the creation of NATO, the UN especially the ICC who are now acting to kill in advance people who might stir everyone to war. If wars were indicators of the best time to move to the next stage and if we ‘disable’ the alarms or warning in the wars how then are we going to move to the next stage if the wars or alarms where the triggers and catalyst that would make us move forward? So, disabling these vehicles of change we have made ourselves be stuck in one stage the defensive stages. We think everything is okay because we are comfortable, but the truth is, we are comfortable because we are sacrificing the most important things. We have chosen the easy way and we are lying to ourselves that everything is okay when we are working way below our optimal levels. My point throughout the book is that we as humans through cults like NATO, the UN and the ICC we have sat comfortably and we think we are great we can make the greatest weapons and start the greatest wars or the most modern concentration camps in Guantanamo Bay, etc. but if you were the current robots your owners the clever humans would be cursing calling you dumb fucks etc. just the same as God or the creator etc. is viewing humanity today as short-sighted only thinking about tomorrow and never about the time far ahead and our capabilities. We have the greatest potential to make sacrifices and evolve completely to live a better life globally not just one superpower.

So, going back to the issues at the beginning of the chapter about religion. So, what is the place and role of religion? I think religion distracts the true meanings in the bible or Quran, etc. I am seeping further into religion as it is linked to the issues in the Middle East and the fighting has religion as the underlying reason. My current understanding of what these holy books say about heaven, God or Allah and humanity. So, religion teaches humans that humanity will die and go to heaven. Life here on earth is part of the journey to go to heaven. The focus is on life in heaven. Our life’s purpose is to prepare us to go to heaven. So, life on earth is a temporary feature but the main thing is in heaven. So, this kind of teaching or understanding makes other people want to skip this life to quickly go to heaven. If heaven is the best life can be with everything you want given to you why waste life here on earth, then? This is the main reason why some people would prefer to die through suicide bombing to avoid all the pains this life has to offer and enjoy a better life in heaven. In heaven as far as I understand it is a place so advanced that humans are happy ever after. In heaven, there are no worries like worries here on earth. In heaven, you can marry or be given as many virgins you want. In heaven, you don’t worry about money and food which are abundant. In heaven, you don’t get tortured, etc. or be forced to choose or fight others because everyone is a friend and in harmony with each other. There is peace in heaven as compared to life here on earth. So, you can see why people who are told about heaven would rather die to go to a better life than the current one. Religion states that God is loving and as such invites all to heaven after death. It’s God’s plan for us to die so that we go to heaven.

First, I ask you a question. What kind of self-esteem do people who commit suicide or kill themselves have? Just generalization I know no one might understand what people are feeling in that state but for argument’s sake, I think very low self-esteemed people would fit this criterion. So, I can argue that self-esteem is linked and related to thoughts of suicide or dying or killing others, etc. or revenge. These situations are contradictory that it will be highly unlikely to find a person with high self-esteem who wants to commit suicide as well as high self-esteem contradicts or conflicts with feelings of suicide, etc.

These areas fall under the poorest of the world with life so hard that people would wish to die to ease the pain and worries. Things you take for granted in some areas can be scarce to find things like food, etc. These countries are in constant fighting with no chance of peace. The whole world stirs the fighting without any solutions to stop this and you can ask why? The same areas are rich in oil and if these areas are peaceful, then the prices of oil will be very high than the current prices. So, wars are there as a means of getting these resources cheaper worldwide. So, the whole globe is happy if there is turmoil and fighting as peace can mean the destruction of economies globally. Imagine the world without oil as oil in the hands of a few countries can mean unaffordable prices globally. So, the more the Middle East is in misery the better the world around it. My question is; Is this fair when it involves children and women dying due to the war or military missile strikes as witnessed in Syria? The nations supporting these strikes argue too that globally if there are no oil resources women and children still die too from malnutrition as there is no oil to drive the cars to transport the resources. Their argument is that more children and women die than say those killed by military action, so their efforts are justified as they aim to provide oil globally cheaper.

Some years ago, the Persian Gulf countries realized that they can be very rich from the oil and can rule the world if they wanted as they could bring the rest of the world to a halt simply by forming cults to limit production to push the prices. Earlier on before this, the market was free uncontrolled, and people bargained and negotiated for oil through separate suppliers all with their specific yet different demands. Then after some time these oil-producing countries became greedy and decided to take things into their hands just like the Allies did earlier after the Second World War by grouping and forming NATO, the UN, the ICC, etc. So, these countries formed cults that controls supply and influence demand. To make things worse, these nations went on to nationalize oil reserves making it easy for the states to control supply linking politics and oil supply something that was taken in bad taste by the powerful countries as they woke up and found out that the only power they had was based on weapons. This is true of the long petrol queues that showed the world who was the real boss. I think this was the start of the real Middle East problems. I can argue that it could be a deliberate political strategy to destabilize and keep the Middle East in turmoil so that oil supply globally is stable and affordable.

So, the world realized that oil was one thing that can paralyze the globe, so the governments drew plans declaring war on all nations in the Middle East who had nationalized oil reserves. What is happening now is simply part of the twenty to twenty-five-year contingency plans drawn decades ago? Talking of peace in the Middle East will have to go a long way than just quarrels between the countries involved. First, let’s look at the strategies to deal with the oil of the Middle East.

1> The first strategy was to supply weapons and destabilize the Middle East and destroy the control of the government thereby destabilizing the grip of the government.

      This also involved the weakening approach that targeted governments who nationalized oils making them prone to being removed and create all kinds of problems so that the power of that government is reduced. The governments are less liked so that they can act to reduce their impact and policies regarding the amount of oil supply.

      This led to the establishment of the so-called sanctions with the aim to weaken governments and reduce their power as to dealing with oil. Governments who had nationalized oil would and could use oil as a political agenda to bring the whole globe to a halt. Their power was so immense that they had become very powerful and only sanctions could destroy all that. Sanctions rally support and support-internal-turmoil to destabilize the government to be weak as regarding setting up oil prices and demand or production numbers. If a country is sanctioned, the idea is to rally locals to fight that government and make it easy to remove that government so that they can be weak as to regard to setting production limits and prices. Sanctions are a weapon as they will make it easy for these governments to increase production. Sanctions will make it easy for these governments to come to the negotiating table as sanctions affect the supply of basic goods killing the innocent and if the government can’t do anything to avert such losses, then rebels uprise and destabilize the government weakening their stance. The government will be left with no option as they are made to not afford the basic and kids and women end up without food and medicines etc. while the governments are holding oil reserves. In the end, local instability will lead these governments to succumb to the demands of the West, etc. Sanctions go further to create instability on the basis that a hungry man is an angry man in the hope that the only way to remove governments from power is to use the locals to start a coup through civil unrest. The idea is to make the governments stay in power in short-term or facing instability all the time and not to be complacent to put real strict oil production limits etc. so to reduce global supply lowering prices.

2>  The second strategy involves military action following the twenty-five-year-old contingency plans. One thing one must understand is that the military drafts contingency plans to deal with recurrent problems and given that lack of oil which everyone was depended on was a forever thing no wonder the military was drafted to be the solution. Lack of oil resources globally would only lead to one thing; wars. Picture the Persian Gulf wars of the 80s etc. these were no mere accidents but simply the fulfillment of contingency plans. That is true of 9/11 too as a trigger of the fulfillment to act on the contingency plans. I pointed throughout this book that a strategy centered around the Colony Collapse Strategy was adopted directly or indirectly and is used now and was used to compile a list of problematic countries especially those with oil. A list to be followed by each President or Prime Minister in power. They all in their four or eight years in office must tackle those on the list of the contingency plans. This involves every leader dealing with at least one of the so-called threats and eliminating that to minimize oil prices and ensure the future supply. I pointed out that the West and their cults have embarked on a contingency plan or project to eliminate potential people who can influence events or lead to a war or bring the cult to a halt through restricting oil production. Each President must takeout enemies directly through military action or indirectly through the CIA, UN’s ICC, etc. So, if the oil reserves are nationalized war is imminent and inevitable as a way of ensuring affordability and continuous supply. The idea behind nationalizing oil is to limit production and supply to push prices and gain global power as well. So, the strategy adopted is to eliminate the alpha dominant male to weaken the rest in order to conquer, move-in and change everything and put puppets who can abide by the production and supply of oil. In short, this Colony Collapse Strategy is the hacking literally to death of the leader and then moving in and just like a computer hacker to change, manipulate and modify with the aim to cause collapse one day. I mentioned Dwight Eisenhower during the 1956 Suez Canal arguing that only nationalizing oil reserves would make military action a must. Ever since the following Presidents and Prime Ministers have embarked on killing sprees to eliminate potential threats who would otherwise use oil to start a war.

3>  We have seen the West invading in the name of human rights whenever things get better and when they leave, they leave sectoral violence rampant a strategy to keep the turmoil to ensure low prices and guarantee future supply.

4>  Religion has been misinterpreted and used to drive instability agendas to keep these countries in constant wars. Some people have used religion to make life hard for the people and reduce self-esteem that further make the turmoil worse as people who face massive hardships despite the country owning oil worth $billions or more. In the end, they resort to violence with the promises of a better life in heaven where they can get whatever has been denied them here through several policies and other forms of interference referred to as protection.

5>  Protection to keep people poorer and miserable to perpetuate the problems to ensure low fuel prices. Protectorate agreements with the Persian Gulf countries date back to the 1850s where all oil-rich countries signed the protection treaty where they gave up security and defense to a third-party in exchange of oil a formula that led to disaster after the treaties ended with the protectorates grantors always finding ways to influence activities still to help lower global oil and increase supply as an alternative to military action. The idea is that it is easy to supply things cheaply things like weapons that in turn lead to further instability as people kill each other in sectoral violence based on culture and religion. Protection also means ‘tricking people to trap them’ for example through deception to create situations where people do something after getting facts that tend up to be cooked up. A good example is the Iraq dossier where people went to war based on this report that tends to be a lie faked just to justify the war. So, people are trapped through a lie and in the end blackmailed and threatened and put ‘on death row’ whether they will be given a way-out usually through instant violence and death rather than be tortured for eternity. A look at Loose Change video will point to the more methods used where victims are tricked and lied to that they are carrying out a rehearsal or an act until that very moment they realize that they are caught up in some dodgy life or death situation. In the end, these people after being tricked and betrayed will aim to revenge as a way-out killing people in suicide attacks, etc.

6> The sixth strategy involves a global strategy that unfairly presses the Middle East down as a solution to global problems perpetrated at a global level through agencies like the UN imposing sanctions that only further increase the turmoil and instability. The argument being that depriving the globe of oil is a threat to peace and security itself and given the fact that the world’s oil is in the hands of a few countries morally to these people, it is justified to interfere or take military action for the sake of all. These people usually the West argue that these countries in the Middle East with oil reserves have only been endorsed as the holders of oil on behalf of the whole world as oil is a commodity needed by everyone and it is simply a duty of these countries to ensure a good supply and nationalizing these oil reserves is not only a selfish act but a criminal one too to automatically invoke military action.

Dwight Eisenhower argued that;

Nationalizing the canal ‘was not the same as nationalizing oil wells… [which] exhaust a nation’s resources.’ 

Oil is too expensive to be left to market forces as it depletes the countries money as it increases the bill so that it will be cheaper instead of buying at such high prices to make weapons and go to war. The reason behind this is the fact that it is clever to look for cheaper ways of getting resources or doing business. The prices of oil have business strategic justifications that whenever the price goes high, it will be reasonable for a sound mind to make weapons cheaper and then use weapons to get the oil. It would be a waste of resources to spend all that money when you can kill and get the resources. This justified the adoption of the Colony Collapse Strategy in which the government of the developed countries with the backing of cults like NATO, the UN, ICC, etc. realized that it was cheaper to just kill the alpha male the dictator, Saddam, Gaddafi, etc. and see the collapse of the society as the alpha male is removed especially in traumatic ways to weaken anyone who might be thinking of launching revenge attacks etc. and to put their people or use locals who act as puppets and who obey the production targets to ensure affordable oil globally. This strategy is justified that the deaths if nothing is done are greater globally than the deaths resulting from military action. So say if nothing is done 3 million people for fuck’s sake will die as no resources are transported globally or machines that use oil are not working due to lack of oil etc. and this can’t be tolerated and it can be justified that 500 000 thousand people die through a military invasion that ensures supply and saves 3 million.

We stand for everyone and I have personally argued that we must change completely. We have been focused on trivial things which now are obsolete like wars and all the weapons, etc. Our laws will ban all these that in turn will free resources we are using for the military to buy oil at fair prices so that no one must die even a single child. Our laws will ban military action no matter what. Instead of finding wars as a cheaper way of getting oil at lower prices I am going to make these people think about other alternate energy sources like electricity and with time I will ban the use of fossil fuels for cars and other vehicles even if the oil is still there. The idea being that of forcing these people to invest in research and development and find other new fuels resources. There must never be any justification for killing even a single child. Our laws like I have argued throughout take a holistic approach to solving global issues. Everything will fit perfectly like a jigsaw puzzle. Prioritizing life and it’s preserving will remove all the arguments for killing and stirring violence. Banning oil-dependent vehicles and machines will not just resolve a lot of issues in the Middle East but will make everyone think outside of the box. A true and sure way to bring peace to the Middle East. I can guarantee you that because I know for sure the past policies have failed to bring peace for the past seventy years.

Ever lusted for someone’s girlfriend? Surely you would not make conditions for them to be in harmony with each other. You will do whatever you can do to make sure one day she might run to tell you how a freak the boyfriend is etc. and end up in your arms. You will play all the tricks so that they fight because you want her too. So, you have a vested interest and you can only weaken them if they fight. If they are solid and loving, you will wait forever. The same applies here. Everyone wants oil and oil to drive the economy to remember the long petrol queues? So, the global stance is to stir turmoil in the Middle East selling weapons behind back doors and selectively choosing certain countries to create resentment and at local level selecting one tribe or people over the other and labeling the other less superior just to stir sectoral violence and keep the region in turmoil. All this to weaken the powers of these governments who had nationalized oil reserves.

I think there is a strong link between military invasion and the nationalization of oil reserves globally if the country has oil reserves. The idea of nationalization of oil is to increase net present value and make the best profits out of oil for any government using political tools to influence prices through restricted supply. Producing less to increase global prices and above all to ban private international companies to control oil supply and oil prices. This makes these governments the sole decision-makers. So, the nationalization of oil makes these countries powerful as they can play with supply to bargain in other areas and show the world who is boss. So is there a link between military action or hostility towards a country and nationalization of oil resources.

*The Soviet Union nationalized oil in 1939

*Mexico 1969

*Iran 1951

*Iraq 1961

*Egypt 1962

*Argentina 1963

*Venezuela 1970s

* Libya 1970s

*Saudi Arabia 1070s

*Russia re-nationalized oil in the 2000s.

The strategy is to use sanctions or landmines to weaken the governments and stir a revolution that will result in the overthrow of the government to weaken the government stir unrest and then use that to justify invasion under human rights. All the countries that have nationalized oils are targeted and their leaders a task by each and every President or Prime Minister to solve through military action or the CIA with other African countries under the watchful eye of the ICC and the UN who are swift to impose sanctions. If not sanctions, then landmines do the same and produce the same results with fertile land rendered useless with the results that people will have less land to farm resulting in starvation that can lead to a revolution or simply justifies an invasion.

This is not a recent thing and dates to the beginning of the bible times. Rifts exist and have ever existed and simply saying it’s the West will be an under-representation of the facts. In the bible we have Abel and Cain fighting and trying to please God as the best and God choosing one over the other that leads to jealous. The Middle East is composed of people in the Quran and even then, the fighting existed, and the killings were there too for leadership and dominance with each group trying to be the best. In short, it’s about the appointment to the throne as a leader. In life or religious circles, there are two ways in which people could be appointed depending on what you are talking about. There was and still is a belief that bloodline can determine who becomes a leader. Monarchies etc. follow this pattern. In religious circles, it’s a different issue as God or Allah appoints people regardless of blood. It is up to God to choose who will be the leader and leadership unlike in kingship and monarchies cannot be guaranteed by blood. You must have a special standing with God or Allah than just by blood. So, the prophet died before deciding who would take over from him. Those in his bloodline assumed leadership roles while those who believed that leadership was not guaranteed by blood argued that the relatives or bloodline were not rightful leaders. That’s the beginning of the split. The Sunnis followed the bloodline of the prophet and Shia’s followed the spiritual successor. Another thing is religion as well.

In religion what was ever a prophet said even when just talking without any specific reference must be fulfilled. If I say I have to be a billionaire somehow in my life and everyone follows me that has to come true and all the followers will have to make it a reality otherwise there is no reason for wasting time praying or following that leader. Whatever is written must be fulfilled and so people do the wrong things to make the prophecy come true.

This is one of the reasons why solving the Middle East will go further away than just stopping the fighting. Religion is based on written things and everything written must be fulfilled. If it is written that there shall be a beast who will destroy another beast the followers and believers of these books must create the two beasts and make one kill the other. It is a kind of thinking that is troubling and one that acts like a Film Script. Everything that will happen on earth is already written and everyone must follow the film scripts and make sure that the prophecy is fulfilled. So, claims to solve the middle eastern problems without understanding all this might only fuel violence. The West’s intentions might be genuine but the fact that they have no clue might make things worse. A perfect example is the making of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel as prophesied by the bible but something that increases tensions and fighting. So, if the people are only fulfilling what is already written what is the future of dialog and negotiations. You must also understand that the prophecies must be fulfilled, and the prophets prophesied that there shall be divisions and groups all who will claim to be the best and among all these only one will be pure the chosen one. So, everyone will try to be the best and even kill each other as a way of fulfilling all this as something to last a thousand years so until that has passed people will simply quarrel to fill this prophecy otherwise religion is nothing.

Religion declares that mankind will live and let die before enjoying the best life has to offer. This life is just to prepare people for the good life. It’s like saying I will torture you so that you enjoy tomorrow even better. Mind you there is no justification whatsoever for the torture you torture someone then be prepared to die. So, the pain and misery in this life are just to make the next life appreciated. Whatever you find hard to get in this life you will get easily in the next life. So, to be rewarded say with virgins in heaven you must recruit people as well. Yes, just like inviting your friends and getting a reward thing. Dying alone will not make you be rewarded but if you kill, you will have helped people avoid misery here on earth and to enjoy life faster in heaven and as such Allah will reward you. So, we have suicide bombers facing the hardest lives, or their kids being forced into being a martyr with their families promised to be looked after or rewarded in the event of death.

Life is a development process an end and not a means to an end. I am referring to life on earth. So, we live to live forever, young, and happily forever. When people die, it’s a shame because it only means that mankind has failed somehow. We see life as a puzzle to solve all obstacles so that we become like whoever created life. If we take the position of robots, robots are not there to die so that they enjoy life as other forms of robots somewhere. No one will create robots with the aim that they self-destruct and come back as say chickens or for them to live in space as spirits. Unless if we know that one day the robots will evolve so much, they will end up like humans thinking and acting like us. This is the main reason behind robot creation in artificial intelligence and not just for them to perform tasks or our wishful thinking that they will evolve to become something else. So, as humans just like we expect to create robots that can become like us and live like us God’s plan is not for us to die and take another form and crowd his place in heaven. His idea was to create and make humans evolve to become like him so that they rule the earth just like he rules the heaven. God is creating a small god that will be him. This small god will be the god of earth while he is God of heaven. We create robots so they become ‘small people’ who will run some parts of earth relieving humans, so they do what we do while we chill and relax and still earn.

 But life is not easy there are so many things we can do, and we must avoid, and as such we must think and solve puzzles to reach the next stages. Think of life as a game. To reach the next stage you must complete the first stage. Collect all rewards you can use like swords to strike the dinosaurs with and create some juju to heal the attacks by the dragon, etc. Once that is achieved then can you go to the next stage. [Maybe I should patent this idea?] Next stage we have killed the dinosaurs, so it is extinct, so we no longer need a sword or of that size, but we have new threats in the form of aliens. So, we work hard and get rewards with a different weapon that makes the aliens evaporate.  We have realized that through luck we can make our bodies grow huge muscles around certain areas so we now know we don’t need heavy metals etc. a metal jersey can save us from any attacks. So, armor changes too. We realize that some dangers that were there before are no longer there. We increase research and development. We find out that we have other planets. We start thinking about making vehicles to take us there. So, we now know we don’t need swords and huge armor, etc. as there are no longer threats. So, we channel resources according. There is a thing to discover and make to help us progress to the next stage. There is no point getting stuck in stage one otherwise, we run out of time and the game will simply confirm a; game over status. So, we aim to collect rewards fast and move. So, likewise, life is about finding solutions abandoning other rewards and weapons we don’t need so we progress further. God or the creator or Allah etc. puts puzzles we must solve. Life must mean living here on earth. All the misery we have are challenges that need quick and good thinking. Someone somehow must act and solve all this. It’s a challenge but something that must be done. Life is not a vehicle-to-another life. Life is not a means to an end but an end in that we live to live life if possible and as happy as ever. Life as a journey to a better life and heaven is just a state of life where we have solved all the puzzles and realized that if tortoises can live up to two-hundred years can slowing everything down help? What can we do to avoid aging, etc.? We can’t find these answers unless we invest and put resources and start working on finding answers. We must sacrifice other areas. This is the challenge. To progress, you can’t do both as they are not complementary as they compete for resources. The military provides everyone with a smile but is it the best option or a trick to test who really has the big guns in brains i.e. a huge thinking power. So, if we are not able to progress then we are doing nothing at all in that direction. I argued that they disabled warnings or tips so that we can only be in this stage forever because in this stage they can be bullies, form cults and make weapons and take whatever they want at will. If the oil prices rise, simply invade and kill the leader then denationalize oil, simple. Or simply preach of another life and reduce the people’s self-esteem and tarnish any hope of a better life. So, heaven to us is a stage we must strive to achieve here on earth. It’s an advanced stage in the development process we must achieve through clever use of resources to abandon some even favorable ones to complete the challenge. So, heaven is life on earth that is so advanced that we all work together, avoiding wasting resources on things that are trivial like wars when we can use the power of speech to negotiate and make deals. Dying can make you get-crash God’s residence. God to be honest he does not want humans in heaven above as heaven is for the spirit like him. His aim was to create mankind in flesh to live here on earth as equivalent to God’s heaven. But if mankind can’t solve the puzzle and end up dying and going to heaven as a spirit God as the omnipotent, omnipresence and the omniscient will always welcome mankind, but he would like all m

*The role and place of cryptocurrency.*The role and place of cryptocurrency.*Just like the onset of global wars as a trigger or indicator for a need for a system changeThe global financial crash was a trigger or indicator of the need for a system change. When a system crashes, a new system is needed if the crash is to be avoided in the future. I explained in detail what led to the financial collapse. It was not a coincidence like they want you to believe but a carefully planned devious plan intended to steal money without being caught by those who are too clever and most of which were involved in the development of the current system somehow.

But first I want to introduce a new thought for a while so that you understand the problems we have and how we will solve these.

In 1907 one Duncan MacDougall did a controversial experiment in which he noted that a patient lost 21 grams of weight soon after death and as such therefore concluded that the weight of the soul was 21 grams. The issue of whether this is true or not is not the issue in this book. A human body to breathe and exist and live for an average of 70 to 100 years for argument purposes must have at least 21 grams or air. So, our bodies need air to function properly and blood too. What is air made up of? Air that is breathed is made up of atoms that are on the periodic table. In general, air is made up of nitrogen which accounts for 78%, oxygen which accounts for 21%, water vapor accounts for 4% and lastly, there is argon which accounts for 1%.

The other question I will need to pose is; How many liters of air are needed by an adult person per day? A human adult, according to science, inhales and exhales between 7 to 8 liters of air per minute. Per day, therefore, a human body will inhale and exhale at least 11,000 liters. Air that is inhaled is circulated and then exhaled. Of the 20%-21% inhaled, something like 15% is exhaled, which means 5 to 6 percent is consumed or used in the body or converted to other gaseous. What then affects amounts inhaled will depend on what the person is doing say if sprinting or jogging inhaled air is higher.

>A human body requires oxygen to live

>Oxygen [O2] inhaled is 21% of total air inhaled

>The weight of a soul is 21grams

>78% of inhaled air consists of nitrogen [N2] 

>What can kill a human body is ammonia [NH3] which is dangerous and is a result of mixing nitrogen and 3 X hydrogen. It must be stored below 33. 

>Water is needed by the body and consists of one atom of oxygen and two of hydrogens [H2O] 

>The body needs at least 60% as water intake is the 8x8 rule.

>It is a fact that the human body needs only twenty-five of the 118 elements in the world.

>Only oxygen is found in its pure form the rest as ions

>25 very vital to life

>4 make-up 96% of the body and these are carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen.

>Major elements 3.5% of the body is made up of seven elements; Calcium, phosphorous, potassium, sulfur, sodium, chlorine and magnesium

>Trace elements make of 0.5% and fourteen of these including Baron, Tin, Iron, etc.

>Glucose gives energy to the body and is C6H12O6=Carbon x6, Hydrogen x12, and oxygen x6 

>Overall too much or too little can result in problems

First, what is the periodic table?

“a table of the chemical elements arranged in order of atomic number, usually in rows, so that elements with similar atomic structure (and hence similar chemical properties) appear in vertical columns.”

It is since elements are the building blocks of everything in the world. Temperature differentiates between solid, liquid and gasses. There are 118 elements of which around ninety-four occur naturally, leaving twenty-four as artificially induced. The elements are arranged in rows and columns. A Russian scientist invented the periodic table in 1869.

Let’s look at the periodic table. The atomic number of oxygens which make-up 21% of breathed air is eight. Nitrogen’s atomic number is seven. Argon which has a 1% proportion of breathed air has an atomic number of 18.

What is oxygen then? It is represented by the symbol O and the nucleus of oxygen has eight protons that have a positive charge. Surrounding the nucleus, the middle bit is what is called electrons and often has a negative charge. So, protons are attracted to electrons. The charge on the protons and electrons are the same but opposite. So is a proton having a 4+ the electron will have a -4. Neutrons have no charge so are neutral i.e. 0.

What defines an atom is the number of protons in the nucleus that is the atomic number represented by z.

The body needs blood to function properly and to sustain life. Without blood, there won’t be life. Blood cannot be replaced or made, but it is essential for the transport of essential minerals like oxygen and nutrients to the body. There are four major components of blood, the red blood cells, the white blood cells, platelets, and the plasma. 40 to 45% of blood is made up of these red blood cells. The body produces 5 billion per hour of the red blood cells and they last 4 months 120 Days. Platelets control bleeding and blood loss. Plasma is responsible for the transport of water and nutrients. White blood cells make up only 1% of blood and are vital for defense. They travel through the bloodstream and move to tissue to protect the body.

So, what is the percentage of body weight accounted for by blood?

This is only 7% of body weight. A huge loss of blood can starve the brain of oxygen that is carried in the blood. A loss of blood greater than 2000ml is fatal, which is 40% of the blood volume.

A loss of the blood above 30% will not instantly kill you but will make one a higher heart rate above 120 per minute.

The breathing rate goes up and blood pressure decreases.

>After that, you can pass out.

>Experience shock

>Circulation failure

A loss of 50% can mean the body’s inability to pump blood, resulting in the heart-stopping and other organs shutting down.

>And die

On the other hand, oxygen accounts for 65% of the mass of the body with nitrogen accounting for something around 3 to 4%.

65/100 a bodyweight = amount of oxygen in the body. In humans, oxygen binds to hydrogen to form water, which is 60% of the body. Too much is dangerous, as it causes cell oxidation that kills them.

Carbon 18% of body mass

It is vital as all elements in a human body contain carbon which has an atomic number 6.

10% of body weight is Hydrogen

Usually attached to oxygen to form water. Found in all other elements just like carbon.

3% of body weight is nitrogen.

Absorbed from food and transported to the lungs needed for protein synthesis. Atomic number 7.

Mass fraction of these elements;

Oxygen 6.5 x 10-1 

Carbon 1.8 x10-1

Hydrogen 1x10-1

Nitrogen 3x 10-2

I have laid out the basics about the human body and the vital elements needed to sustain life. The human body is a very complex system that really works and often misunderstood in that humans will never create for the foreseeable future another human being because the body is the perfect entity so complex that it’s difficult to recreate. For argument’s sake, I am going to argue that the human body is the miniature version or model of the big system be it company, an institution, a government, a nation or globe. My argument throughout this chapter is this; if you want a perfect system that really works you must design the system based on the functions of the body. This is a tried and tested way and it works if the elements and atoms, then protons, neutrons, and the electrodes are understood. For argument’s sake, one can say the body is a model of a nation. All you need for the smooth operation is to use proportion and recreate the same system and everything is poised to work perfectly. This is true as the structure of the body and its functions are used to create a working model that is used to run a country. A few countries have two heads, but the other head is passive and doesn’t get involved in the politics of the head as much but is often there. This system is associated with countries with monarchies. The monarchies are like overseers just to give advice and represent the system indirectly. Then there is a head who is active in decision making. Directing the way, the country goes. Some systems have two active heads all who make decisions but one of the heads has superior powers and often is a President with the other Prime Minister. All these two different systems have a central body symbolized by the heart that pumps the life of anybody in the form of blood which is represented by money in the real world. Other financial institutions are there to supply the body with certain elements vital like oxygen from the lungs. So, blood in the human body is represented by money in the real world. So, if blood is vital for any life of the body so as money is for the country. The system before was like a human being with blood and without anything else like oxygen yet it functioned but this meant central control and manipulation by the head through the central bank. In real life, we have seen that if it was a person he would not have lived, and this meant the government adopting a stringent plan that will create a ghost oxygen element to keep the system functioning. So, to start with our system is flawed in that the blood circulated has no oxygen in it and the government must create ways of making sure that the blood carries oxygen but supplied centrally. The system was suffocating and the blood alone was not enough as blood was mixed with oxygen centrally which is wrong as oxygen was to be channeled from the air into the system through the head’s nostrils down to the lungs or financial institutions and carried by the blood to the central bank 

. 

If a human body cannot live if starved of oxygen surely likewise, the system was bound to fail. The idea so far is that the monetary system on its own is bound to fail and we have seen the collapse of the financial institutions as a testament to this. It’s just like blood in the body forcibly mixed with not enough oxygen in the heart centrally rather than being absorbed freely from prefect points like the nostrils. So, the notion here is one that highlights the need for oxygen not to replace blood but to supplement and augment the blood. In other words, digital currency is like oxygen it is part of and complementary to fiat money. The two together complete a perfect system. One must understand the proportions needed as one in excess will be toxic to the whole system. It’s not a fact of Bitcoin as oxygen replacing the fiat money, no. It’s a matter of the two to co-exist cushioning the effects of the financial markets with Bitcoin doing what the fiat money can’t do.

First why Bitcoin is like oxygen in human anatomy. Cryptography;

It is defined as the art of solving codes, but this definition does not do justice. First, I think it’s relevant to look at the properties of oxygen.

>It is invisible. Can you see the air? Can you touch the air? So, it is intangible but exists. You can contain air if you change its state say from a gaseous form to a solid or liquid. So, one can surely say that oxygen is hidden because we know air exist, but we can’t see it and Bitcoin as oxygen is something derived from the idea that it is hidden too through encryption. Hence the term cryptocurrency meaning something hidden through codes because we can’t see oxygen it is hidden but is there. So, bitcoins are not tangible. They don’t exist intangible forms and as such can be said to be encrypted and so will require decoding of some sort.

Definition of cryptocurrency can support my arguments above;

“a digital currency in which encryption techniques are used to regulate the generation of units of currency and verify the transfer of funds, operating independently of a central bank.”

Google Dictionary.

Encryption;

The central part of this idea is the fact that Bitcoin must go through a process called encryption transforming the messages so that only the intended people can read them.

>The other attribute is that oxygen is readily available globally and is everywhere and is not controlled like blood that must be pumped by the heart. Oxygen is in quadrillions in infinite form. It is not governed by the body as blood is. You can get oxygen from outside the system that is Bitcoin is decentralized, unlike fiat money or blood that must be contained in the body and pumped by the central agency or heart. It does not matter how much we can lose and can’t be enforced or seized. But for blood, it’s a different situation lose 2000 ml and you are in a deep problem that can see the collapse of the economy. Do you know the reasons behind these tough money laundering government schemes? They have roots in blood. Blood just like money can’t be made somewhere else just like money it is made or printed by the central system only if some of this money or blood is missing or lost. A blood transfusion is behind the printing of new money into the economy. There are certain levels that are needed for any country's finance system to function properly. I went a step further at the beginning of this chapter to explain the role and importance of proportions and quantities of a certain element in the body. Too much or too little will have disastrous effects. So, it’s not just guessed work or luck but requires a great understanding no wonder why financial institutions have been collapsing now and then. Let’s assume the body is like the national of a country. We know we need a certain percentage of weight as blood and oxygen for the body to function properly. So, I can say that the proportions of this element are directly related to the weight of the body and likewise we can create a formula in relation to the number of people in that country.

I can propose a theory in which I can say the amount of blood in a body is equivalent to 7% of the body or number of people in that country.

Money in circulation= 7/100 x the country has 4 million people.

$=7/100 x 4 000 000

For every 4million people, money in circulation must be around 280 000.

Like I said money should not be alone but must be complemented by oxygen as in Bitcoin which must be 65% of the number of the people.

Bitcoin in circulation= 65/100 x 4 000 000

B$=2.6 million for every 4 million people

But we have other elements as well but overall, I showed you at the beginning of the chapter that four elements make-up 96% of the mass of the body the rest are trace elements.

Mass fractions of these elements are

; Oxygen 6.5 x 10-1  

That is 65% of the mass of a body or total population. 

Carbon 1.8 x10-1 

That is 18% of the mass or population. 

Hydrogen 1x10-1 

That is 10% of the mass or population. 

Nitrogen 3x 10 

That is 3% of the mass or population 

Carbon which is represented by another crypto current must be 18 percent of the population.

18/100x 4 000 000=720 000.

Hydrogen being =400 000

Nitrogen being 120 000 for any given 4 million people.

There are other smaller amounts of elements, but which are irrelevant at the time.

So, for a perfect system, if we are to use a human body, we would need the above amounts or percentage in circulation on top of fiat money that is centrally held and operated.

I know you might be thinking that this is becoming a centralized system where everything is rationed. The idea being that for a perfect government system as argued above fiat money alone is insufficient to cushion the effects that lead to the collapse and financial problems but cryptocurrency is needed just like the body requires oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen with these big four accounting for 96% of the elements in the body. It is a matter of balancing these as proportions of the government system. I pointed out that excessive or inadequacy of one can be toxic to the economy. It is a matter of playing with the numbers to reduce or increase, respectively. There are other elements that can change their form by absorbing other elements or by losing some. Water is part of a body and as above, accounts for 60% of the body and we know water is made up of two hydrogen atoms and an oxygen and above all some elements are attracted to some who have a negative or positive balance and this information can be used to offset some colliding these to reduce their proportions. Such knowledge would be vital to maintain a perfect system. I have heard people asking if it comes to cryptocurrency which ones should you hold and in what percentages? I think this model I am proposing will answer that question. The cryptocurrency is to augment the fiat system by providing a cushion and new functions that the current system is lacking. To understand this, I think it is wise to know the problems with the current system the fiat. Just like blood alone there won’t be enough oxygen in the blood to transport other minerals like iron and if the oxygen is limited, the brain might shut down followed by other organs and this is what is referred to as a system crash. Just like with the wars what mankind was doing all these decades was removing the fire alarms so that the warning part if removed and local people or organizations then used to fight local fires but remaining in the buildings. A big risk that the fires might be very huge to consume everyone something that already happened with the 2008 financial collapse. In a perfect system, fire alarms are there and when they sound warnings of fire people run out of the buildings all of them even the fire marshal who will go back to see if they can contain the fire. This is the perfect world. The current system ignores and conflicts with our rules the right to life and to self-preserve. The fact that when there is a fire the people are forced to remain in the building poses risks to life and contradicts self-preservation. Our system encourages running out as fast saving oneself and preserving oneself. The idea here is one of the people creating their own system that augments the current system so that the two can work hand in hand. I think you can recall from the earlier chapter that I argued that the purpose of life is that of us becoming so clever and intelligent and understanding that we know easily the things in life that we can solve our problems and even create our systems to match those of the central system. I argued that God or Allah out of bored and not because he needed mankind created humanity so that one day man will be very intelligent to know what is good and evil and can he be allowed to stretch his hand and eat the fruit of the tree of life and live forever.

Genesis 3v22

Then the LORD God said, “Look, the human beings have become like us, knowing both good and evil. What if they reach out, take fruit from the tree of life, and eat it? Then they will live forever!”.

The gods are jealous that mankind now that he knows what is good and evil, what will happen if he can do the same as us and eat from the tree of life and live forever. This is a justification given for seizures by the state and all the money laundering schemes. The government can be rendered useless overnight if the people establish their own money just like with Bitcoin. So, we can see in countries like China governments clamping down on cryptocurrencies. My own belief is that in the end is to replace the government fiat scheme with not just cryptocurrencies but with something more advanced that combines cryptocurrency and something else. The current system although it is like the blood that is needed it has either to evolve greatly or be changed altogether. Fiat alone is unworkable and the arguments throughout this book are that all the current systems crashed years ago and the governments and everyone else are just hanging in there hoping for the best. But we know change is imminent and inevitable. So why do we have to wait? Our laws will clear all bottlenecks and problems with the current centralized system. I can say the current system has the following problems some of which are addressed by cryptocurrency nevertheless we need a perfect system without these issues.

>The current system is based on faith and trust in the government. How many times have the governments deceived, manipulated and tricked their people? How many people honestly trust their governments. The current system relies on this idea that people will simply trust the governments no matter what with the results that they often deliberately abuse and use fiat money to justify their actions by manipulating their availability and controlling who gets it. A form of indirect blackmail. The current economic, social and financial climate has, so many problems induced or deliberately started and linked to the governments. This has led to the selective distribution of certain services to certain people while neglecting others especially those who don’t trust the government with the resultant inequality. Trust in the government is the cause of huge inequalities as people put their trust in the government to deliver and often let down as they can be denied services. The current fiat therefore is biased and heavily influenced by the central parameters. The problems we have are a direct result of institutions and government influence. I gave my version of 9/11 as a trigger of the global collapse initiated by certain powers to gain from the crash. So, the government can do whatever they want to influence the outcome. I pointed out that 9/11 was part of a roll-back strategy designed to take money back from the people to the central governments taking even their savings and destroying all jobs leaving the people better off so that in the end the governments have so much power to bail banks out. So, in short, the current system is unpredictable it just depends on the mood of the President and government and financial institutions parameters. I as the leader of TWO am opposed to such ambiguity. We want a system that can be trusted and predictable and that is supported and augmented by-laws that close all loopholes and not just removes bottlenecks but also hold everyone accountable for their actions. The fact that the government can deliberately increase the money supply through printing some to devalue the money is a cause of concern as the value of money can easily be lost overnight. The government can implement policies that will affect everyone and give them a competitive advantage over its citizens. The fact that most governments are corrupt makes central control a dodgy aspect of the system.

>All the above only act to increase the risks of collapse as everything is systematized and the impact often great as a lot of institutions etc. will be affected in case of system collapse sending the whole thing down. The current system will only make things worse by increasing global debt that current is above $247 trillion. The governments are incapable of solving this let alone run their countries effectively. Our laws and approaches will not only eliminate these problems but provide a sound system that can be predicted and can’t be abused or manipulated. Mind you we have outlawed all wars often used as covers for gross abuse and corruption. We will hold these people to account and no policies or strategies will be used to justify killing innocent children as they will comply with our laws which involves fiscal aspects. So, it’s a comprehensive or holistic approach that will only see results.

>problems with centralization means most people will remain without bank accounts globally as they will not have government-approved IDs and the whole process treats everyone like terrorists and denying most of the people who really need such services. I think it’s a shame that some governments used terrorism to push as back into time. We were heading in the right direction with less fuss at airports, etc. Then after 9/11 everything become worse like in the previous decades. This is a common problem throughout history that mankind has a tendency of going back recreating previous problems to justify jobs. I pointed out that after the tremendous in medicine, living standards and knowledge and education humanity nearly eradicated diseases and all health problems. Then the leaders to fulfill their political agendas then started encouraging universities and private companies to make bio-engineered viruses. At the same time asking other companies to start working on the cures of these bio-engineered threats. After much controversy, the bioengineering stopped. Then now some countries have started making digital cyber threats and hoping that some people might start looking for ways to eradicate all these. The same issue here. People made traveling easy and fast and safe. Then come 9/11 everything went back again to the state things were like before. What we have been doing for the past century is to replace the same problem with an advanced one and then start all over again looking for solutions when we should be reducing and moving to other areas.

>The idea set out decades ago was to make everyone be part of the banking system and improve literacy rates yet still the system is so cumbersome and restrictive that not only people are denied services and facilities they are discouraged in knowing how things work as bureaucracy and central control and censorship make everything not appealing.

Our aim is to make sure everyone here on earth has a bank and access to bank accounts and it does not have to be so rigid. We will aim to provide a global space identity recognized worldwide that will simplify everything and make opening bank accounts as easy as getting a mobile phone. The basic accounts shall be for everyone with advanced accounts based on the ability to pay.

I think Bitcoin goes some way in dealing with the current fiat system, but it must be complemented by even huge projects. If money is blood and for argument’s sake, I say the current system needs to be evolved but can still be part of the system mainly for larger issues and leaving Bitcoin and others dealing with the day-to-day of local issues. Then there must be another currency that combines the blood that is fiat money, Bitcoin that is oxygen and hydrogen to make water currency or equivalent as water accounts for 60% of the body and can solve shortfalls of both the Bitcoin and the fiat money system. Oxygen has a polarity in that it can be charged on one end whereas water is and can be charged on both ends. The stream of water tends to bend due to this polarity. A shared pair of hydrogen bonds the oxygen and hydrogen. Water’s density has unevenly distributed electrons. There are other properties of water that includes having a high heat vaporization rate, huge surface tension, and acts as a solvent and has a high specific heat rate. Water presses non-polar molecules together. In other words, water can be ionized to release acids and attract bases where a pH of seven is neutral and between 1-6 the pH or acidity rate can be said to be acidity and above the neutral seven is said to be alkalinity usually between 8-14. So if water was a cryptocurrency it would be the ideal element in that it is needed as part of the whole system taking both the strength of the fiat and the Bitcoin combining these to come up with a solution that can be used and not be biased but easily controlled as we saw water being bent by static electricity. The fact that water is universally soluble if cryptocurrency will easily be used globally reaching billions still unbanked. The cryptocurrency must be easily absorbed and manipulated to convert other currencies or even join some currencies together. So, in short polarity of water makes it if cryptocurrency an ideal medium of exchange.

It is the presence of hydrogen that holds water molecules together and creates surface tension that water can have a bigger surface tension than the area containing it before falling off. Imagine a cryptocurrency that can exceed the area it is to serve or a huge population before its collapse.

Adhesion which allows water molecules to the attached to another surface. 

We have a detailed fiat and cryptocurrency plan. We have our own cryptocurrency the Futuregoldcoin and the Calycoin. I think it’s best to illustrate the problems first before providing the solutions. Our comprehensive solutions are in later Chapters. You can read our Whitepaper that lays down our plan for the global system and the monetary policy. Check the appendix as well. 

*We should aim to live longer up to 200 years for now and forever. What can be done?

*Imagine $1.7 trillion being poured into research and technological development? 

*Imagine what things we can achieve that can help humanity? Imagine the kind of jobs that can be created? The possibilities are endless. 

*Imagine companies’ competition to come up with the best plans, software, technology, etc. all to improve human life? 

Current military technology can be adapted or evolved to benefit humanity. We are tired of destructive technology we have seen enough. Can the same technology be used to enhance life? To create life. To help humanity solve today’s problems. The military can adapt or evolve something I have been saying in earlier chapters. Above all, to help fulfill the first rule research and development into prolonging life, enhancing the quality of life, elimination of defects, diseases, and any genetic defects should be our priority. We are outsmarted by animals like tortoises that can live up to 200 years. It’s not just about prolonging life it’s about the quality of life as well. It is a grave offense to make technology that ages the population very fast as is the norm in some developed countries simply because the government wants to hold the bull by its horns and decide who dies and when. I think most governments are taking the easy route of failing to think and make bold decisions to change the current norm. I think it’s not just irresponsible but very complacent for governments to make viruses that end life and load your own people with watermarks. Eugenic movements still exist although pushed underground and disguised as population or immigration controls. The same technology that is being used to reverse all life processes can be used to prolong life if perfected well and supported by new laws that punish anyone who reverses human body functions. The implanting of devices to all populations at birth poses a big risk and might threaten human existence. This is because since its artificial intelligence someone might hack the system and kill the whole country in their sleep. There are so many risks involved in replacing the natural nervous system with a remotely operated implanted medical device. This is what is happening especially in developed countries had nothing to do with the need to enhance or prolong life but everything to do with government population control. This is how it works.

The technological advancement has meant devices being made to help governments control the population in these cases the aging population.  The aging population is a big problem in developed countries as the strains on the government’s balance sheet are huge with huge pensions and health bills. So, governments invested $ billions to find a way to kill the old after reducing their life span by speeding up the aging process and to raise money as well for those who can pay for aging to be slowed down, etc. At birth; all children through the works of the Pediatrician who implants a small device soon after birth on the baby’s lumbar bone and an electrode needle fired into the left side of the back-leg area. The device is like a small propeller that rotates like the airplane engines but smaller with sucking and expelling properties and can rotate in either way with valves that can be opened or closed. The device has GPS properties and is operated like a drone remotely. The electrode is used for stimulation through electromagnetic nerve manipulation imitating the body functions through a sophisticated program. The device can be programmed so certain activities can happen at certain times. This device can be used to speed any processes like sperm production, puberty, growing fast and aging. The device acts like a mousetrap and can be used to blind people as it can pull the iris of the eye to the side or up to obstruct sight.

      1. > Device is used to blind people as a weapon or a defensive weapon. Imagine walking and suddenly the device flips and turns the iris at a certain angle into the socket so the view is blocked, and you can’t see. The device is used to immobilize people as well. Imagine you are an enemy and about to attack someone prominent and suddenly the iris rotates into the socket so that sight is lost, and you are automatically immobilized. 

      2. > The device is used as a warning and separation device in that imagine the enemy has the device as well and when you are in the vicinity, the device triggers a mechanism that warns you that someone usually an enemy is around.  This is not a big issue since if you all have the same device then it means you are on the same issue above all both of you have to have GPS properties and there must be a third-party controlling the exchanges of transmitted signals acting as the receiver, the decoder, and the transmitter. This person will know as well if you are getting closer. The idea is derived from the airplane radar system with different planes on the radar and warning systems activating when a plane comes near the other. 

3. >The device can be used as a weapon a Cyber high-tech gadget that emits electromagnetic signals that are harmful that can immobilize the enemy say by switching off the enemy’s device putting him to sleep or blackout.

4. > The device can be used to store certain feelings and scenes in life. Let’s say someone has the device and is hit by a lorry if someone is linked to that person through synchronizing the other person who is linked to the person who has just been hit by a lorry whom we can call the hacker can feel whatever the person who was hit felt. So, in other words, you can transfer the feeling of a person the moment that person died. That means you can use the device to torture other people or make them feel horrific feelings felt by a person just before he or she dies. This is one of the areas the device is being used as a weapon to traumatized people as they felt all the pain felt by say a stab victim. In worst cases, the device is used to kill as the device is used to imitate the same damage say suffered by the victim hit by the lorry.

5. > The device is a weapon in that it captures the damage done by a bullet that hit another with a similar device. If the two are synchronized, then someone through amplifying the device can be used to cause the same damage to a person say thousands of miles away. So, the device is a killing machine too.

6. > The device can be used to stress a person to breaking point as it rotates continuously non-stop until a person commits suicide.

7. > The device is used to cause brain damage. Imagine a drone in your body rotating continuously shaking your brain until it’s a mess. That can-do damage as all memories can be wiped out.

8. > The device is used to trick people as if they are testing how they can remember things or follow instructions. What happens is that a person is given instructions in his or her sleep and tested the next day if he or she can still remember the message in the dream. If he can remember the message in the dream, then the shaking to test what he can recall as brain porosity or the rate of retention of messages. What will then happen is that this becomes common that after being told a message in his dream his brain is shaken pretending to test the retention capability of his brain to easily remember things but what is actually happening is that the brain is being changed from a solid stuff to mash and liquid with time therefore causing brain damage?

9. > Linked to the point above is the fact that the teaching hospital pretends they are coaching secret tricks when whatever one does is told to through signs from other people or through digital messages that are sent to the device. What is happening is that there are creating a dependency situation where the person can’t use his own decision waiting for input? If he disobeys, he is then tortured but if he listens, then he is rewarded. In the end, his brain is distorted as in the end they will remove input ending up hesitating fearing to be tortured he becomes undecided.

10. > A GPS on a human being is a breach of all international laws and above all, it conflicts with the first rule the right to life. GPS uses radiation and or harmful waves. The main reasons for these devices are to snoop and spy on everyone as a national security thing but nothing to do with security but a political strategy to control the people.

11. > The device is used to kill people at will simply by switching off the device choking the victim or blocking other functions.

 New strong laws are needed to make sure that the mentioned above will be a thing of the past. Only technology that enhances life should be invested into.

Implanting devices to the whole population might not be a clever plan if the system can be easily hacked and everyone blinded or put to sleep. This can mean cost in terms of security and new laws to punish hackers might be the answer.

There are dangers of attacks digitally through cyber electromagnetic waves. 

Cyber electronic attack (cyber EA);

“Is the use of electromagnetic energy to attack an adversary’s electronics or access to the electromagnetic spectrum with the intent of destroying an enemy’s ability to use data via networked systems and associated physical infrastructures.”

In the above chapter, this electromagnetic energy is used to attack the device of other people so that the device malfunctions or distorts the working of the device or completely erases the data causing the malfunction. Bear in mind that the device is a small computer running programmed software. This digital software can be tampered with and might malfunction. If an electromagnetic bomb is detonated all these devices might be affected and if everyone has this device, then it can bring humanity to extinction something referred to as Global Catastrophe and Existential risk.

I explained in earlier chapters that a family is the micro perfect representative of a perfect world with everyone working together for the benefit of the family unit. No one in the family will waste precious resources to make weapons to kill other siblings it’s just common knowledge. So, if the whole world is one big family why we waste precious resources on weapons, the military, and defense. The family unit is what it is because the head of the house makes stiff rules that must be followed for the betterment of the whole family. Likewise, Tomorrow’s World Order will put laws to make sure there will never be wars as we know them. All weapons will be banned. Why make these old-fashioned weapons that are expensive and a waste of resources? A family is bound by blood and DNA with the father and mother there to cement bonds between siblings. So research will focus on finding ways to replicate the ‘blood and DNA bonding’ and if that means using advanced devices to link the whole world so that the device acts or replicates ‘blood and same DNA’ for the sake of peace and working together so be it. Now technology has let humanity down, but I can stand here and say that it is not the technology at fault, but you are the problems as humans. There is an old saying that guns don’t kill people, but people kill people. There is a lot of truth in there. Now you have a visionary and as such I will do my best to make sure we put laws to deal with short-sighted leaders who go for short-term benefits and neglect long-term goals that really count. Technology shall be used to enhance life and not shorten it unless if you want yours shortened. So, devices can be used to connect everyone and bridge the gaps that cause you to fight each other.

I think if in the future we can’t get rid of the need for guns what we can do as an option is to evolve these guns. We can have what I have always called an in-built gun. Only Tomorrow’s World Order will have the license to operate these guns for security only as all security issues will be in the hands of us leaving the leaders concerned with running their countries and answerable to us only if they violate the rules. Like I said above the rules are universal and now is common knowledge but easily abused or overridden by other issues mainly defense is the bigger culprit. So, everyone knows that killing women and children is a bad thing so why on earth do we still do it? So, we have made these issues into the first laws. No one shall break these laws and these laws will detect what will follow. All other issues that conflict with these first laws are illegal and forbidden by law. So only TWO will have access to in-built guns we can use to terminate violators clean and fast in their sleep or in broad daylight. We are accountable and we are unbiased and therefore fair and the perfect body to run the globe and let the leaders run their countries. I mentioned the ineffective of the UN that they are like security guards with no guns or powers to arrest violators. We are different. We have powers to kill and impose immediate judgment and action. We are not a creation of any country and don’t represent anyone. Only TWO will have the license to use these in-built guns to kill.

Guns of the future will simply be a thumbnail size device that will act as a linker of all humans and the device will have two sides like a coin and for most people, the device will be stuck on the good side enhancing life and keeping people young. We don’t want people living forever wrinkly and old. So, the challenge is not just to prolong life but to reverse the harmful effects of aging. I will look at that later. The other side will happen when someone has violated our rules where we will use our powers to kill. Institutions like the UN are there to make sure the countries that formed them remain viable forever and as we have recently noticed these countries are the same countries, we are saying that they are causing worldwide problems by interfering without an understanding of local issues and with one aim to gain a competitive advantage whether of getting cheaper oil or other resources. We have noted recently that we have a bully or cult or gangster, so the system has crashed. Only a new system of running the globe can solve the problem. The rise of Tomorrow’s World Order.

Huge investments in research and technological development will start from the basic to enhance and prolong life while reducing aging rates and reversing aging effects in everyone irrespective of ability to pay. The money we save from the military will do the job. In this age weapons made of metals, carbon fiber, etc. are and will be a thing of the past as I explained above if we still need guns for national security, we can develop thumbnail size devices that will be effective guns and or weapons of incapacitating enemies. But the goal is never to make weapons again wasting resources when everyone is becoming friends and a family. So, the reason behind banning guns, weapons and the military is to enhance life. Research and development should aim to understand why people age and the way they age. I know this could be going down, but I bet no one might have found the answers otherwise the richest people today would have paid $billions to have such a technology. We have billionaires aging very fast themselves unless it’s a matter of choice. This is something we must not see in the New World because that will defeat the cries for longevity. No point living longer as a frail old man. So, more money into research and development. If the military somehow can help, then that’s an evolving aspect of it. So why do we age as humans? Is this process reversible? Or can we delay the aging process? What can we eat and what must we not eat, etc.? I personally think there must be laws on what people can eat and can’t eat and what people can apply on their skin and what can’t they apply. I know this is a gray area that still needs a lot of research but TWO will ban eating of certain foods no matter what the general people think. The idea is for the betterment of humanity and the quality of life. What I have discovered is a growing trend that to be recognized as advanced you have to eat or use things that are developed with advanced technology. I think this is the only area I think technology will not work but stick to things we have known for some time. Although research is needed, I believe we age because of a natural process and because of the things we eat and apply to our bodies. Our bodies are made of flesh that is natural but recently we have been taking a lot of chemicals inside and on the skin. If a body is a natural flesh can chemicals of any type be a problem as the body lose their stamina? Are the chemicals dangerous over time despite taken in very small quantities? We apply a lot of skincare elements all of which have one or two components as artificial chemicals. Will these chemicals influence the functioning of the body? I know we have had stories of wonder chemicals etc. but we are aging fast and rough despite the advanced technology. So, my question is are we really doing great as in advancing or somehow technology does not work in this area. Would you not think it is wise to apply to your body or eat only things that your body can use? Surely a body will not use chemicals we see in lotions and other skincare so why do we feed our skin with dangerous chemicals. Would it not be wise to use the food we eat inside as care for the skin? You must know that the skin absorbs chemicals through pores on its surface. Imagine using light treated oil that has no chemicals that might be harmful to your skin. This natural oil will be absorbed and get rid of the body leaving the skin lubricated. Wrinkles are a result of face oil vanishing as we age and how we feel inside. So, a less stressful life can reduce the pronounced wrinkles so it’s not just about cosmetics it’s a comprehensive approach. Our laws of eliminating the stresses caused by weapons and other weapons and the competitions on resources can starve other areas. Our laws and policies will enhance life and help researchers find answers quickly.

There will be laws that encourage technology advancement into cheaper clean transport methods. Our dream is beyond the current system of boundaries. Our model of the future like I said of the family unit. Picture a family house with rooms up and down and a common lounge, etc. You know the easiness of going from one area to the other although your sister might shut the door to her room, but you can sneak in when she is not there. You don’t need a license to go to your brother’s room although he might kick you out. So, the globe is one huge family that must be linked somehow. So, transport will play a major role. The next stage we are pushing into is one of technological advances and advanced networking and cooperation. In this stage, we are so advanced and highly educated with high self-esteem that we are now mature we will have realized that we are all humans and as such, there is no need to kill each other. Imagine the days of slavery that really caused slavery was not the hatred as people think it was a need for cheap labor. A need to get things free and make a fortune. Now we have realized that instead of yearning for cheaper labor we have realized that we can sacrifice other areas like the military because there will be laws in place banning any kind of war. Laws that are enforceable and which TWO will carry with such effectiveness that violations will be a thing for the past. We will have developed rockets and spaceships that will not go to space or moon alone, but which will be used for global travel. Money should be used to make the globe one huge family without unnecessary boundaries. The idea is to have personal missile planes that will launch and travel to another part of the earth in minutes. If we can use the same technology to go to space and moon surely, we can use the technology to connect the globe. The idea is to choose cheaper energy that is clean. Eclectic cars or if we can use water as fuel then let us find that technology. Competition to find solutions and awarding huge contracts if a solution is found. We have a lot to do.

We have a website;

www. globalspaceidentity.com 

that we will use to issue global identification that will in the long run replace your country identity or will complement your own identity. This will give everyone on earth license or passports to travel anywhere globally. Initial we might charge a small fee to get the identity that will act as a global passport. This will be easy to get and will be processed fast as well. Traveling should be easy and fast. Years before terrorism it was much faster than terrorism ruined everything and took us back to the years back. Our new laws dealing with terrorism will clear this bottleneck. I mentioned in an earlier chapter we must develop first-class infrastructure much better than now. Even if it means making houses in the skies, we shall do that so that traveling will be augmented by an excellent infrastructure with people easily booking hotels, etc. globally or others renting their houses when not in use for certain hours, etc. The idea behind this is that the world is like a family and as such, you can do anything you can do in your family house with easy. TWO will clear all the bottlenecks and unnecessary bureaucracy.

Education should be responsible for education. I am surprised that some universities offer a course to find ways of making the deadliest strains of weapons biological, digital or electromagnetic. New laws must ban these courses or degrees I think it’s irresponsible that encourages dodgy practices. If you find the strain, then what? It’s not only banning these but giving severe punishment even death simply because making these strains conflicts with the first rule.

CHAPTER EIGHTEEN

Running a holiday sale or weekly special? Definitely promote it here to get customers excited about getting a sweet deal.

*Working at optimal capacity 

*We have everything we need. 

*No one should be sacrificed but aim to reduce aging rates.

Its criminal and therefore give severe punishment for those deliberately inducing aging of their population in the name of the so-called protection. 

* Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent.

Putting things in place is something that will make sure that humanity will not be tempted to revert to old dodgy practices. I think this is an area where technology will play a big role. Use of open-source peer-to-peer and blockchain technology. I think it will be easy to develop software that will make it easy to report issues of abuse, torture, and violations of our new laws.

The peer-to-peer and the blockchain technology can be used to develop software that can record incidents as they happen and make then instantly report or log these onto the blockchain. This is useful in situations where abuse is perpetrated by those in power or in a position of trust. This will eliminate fears of being targeted or any further abuse, as the information can easily and instantly be stored on the blockchain and stays there. Countries where they violate rules the institutions are quick to cover up and further abuse the victims in order to silence them. I think this blockchain and peer-to-peer technology might be very handy as the culprits be it government officials can be pictured at the very moment the abuse is happening and the information can be sent instantly to a peer who then informs trusted bodies.

Today’s problems are augmented by the fact that most culprits in a position of trust get away with abuse and murder for lack of evidence. Countries violate international rules knowing that it will be hard if not impossible to be brought to justice and technology can become handy too as new gadgets that can be worn by all state parameters can be easily identified and by through apps in phones which send their details to the blockchain. So, all government officials are to carry gadgets that easily let the public identify them, their number, name, etc. The gadgets must be able to pick this information up if they are in the vicinity and be able to store this information on the permanent blockchain. This will deter any wrongdoing or stalking and make people accountable, so they earn respect and be respected and trusted too. I think this technology will come in handy as well when dealing with suspects and evil people. It shall be a law that everyone will carry or upload an app that will send information to the blockchain. The idea is that if you are not violating our laws, then you have nothing to fear. For the violators, you shall not hide or get away with murder. This technology will be used to track you and deliver justice. That alone will act as a deterrent too. Like I have said we shall swear by the assassin to deliver justice. It shall be one man for himself and TWO for us all.

I have proposed also in earlier chapters that the idea of the New World involves free or easy and fast global movements of people, goods, services, and money. The idea is to link everyone and connect everyone somehow and provide the means to do so. In the end, the world should relate to advanced and well-connected networks be it transport, communications, or monetary. This cryptocurrency is just the beginning. We need a form of digital identification that will avoid the current cumbersome bureaucratic system that is obsolete. It will be an easy task to create software and a system where people will have IDs or methods of identifying people that do not require physical passports, etc. The idea is to digitize everything and make it easy worldwide for people to travel from one country to another with speed. There could be a digital app that can verify a person’s attributes to confirm it’s him in seconds or minutes. An example would be the use of the peer-to-peer and blockchain that takes a person’s fingerprints, records his or her voice, scans iris, and gets his digital signature that could be anything or a saliva sample and the information sent instantly to a checking and verifying service that response within minutes as information is sent swiftly. A scan code that acts as a digital passport can be released instantly which the person simply has to scan to pass the passport checking service. The idea is to provide the technology to everyone for a certain fee that can be paid in digital currency.

Tomorrow’s World Order patent for Apocalypto currency.

Patent Apocalypto currency, Apocoin, Apomoney

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.

I David Gomadza has developed an idea today on 03 July 2019 and which I will patent as a new and useful process of the global financial system and the system is referred to as Apocalypto currency. [Read our Whitepaper as well in the appendix.]

This is a digital currency that is ‘revealed’ in the sense that the digital transactions are not encrypted but are left open so that anyone can see and verify them. This is based on ‘macro or block within blockchain’ where transactions are bundled and compressed before being recorded in a macro blockchain. There is no encryption as it is not necessary as we need transparency to fight fraud and corruption, etc. This is on a macro-scale but is based on the peer-to-peer notion but on a macro-scale [government-to-government or institution to institution] with a block or bundled together bundles within blockchains i.e. several bunches of entries bundled together which are compressed though. So, compression of the individual transaction will be involved and the individual files of say institutions or government bodies will be ‘revealed’ that is decompressed upon request. So, within macro-huge blockchains are bundles of related files e.g. transacted on the same day with details of the transaction, etc. The information is permanently kept. So, this system of government and global money will co-exist with cryptocurrency that is done on a micro-level peer-to-peer complementing this. Individuals are concerned with privacy so all transactions are hidden or encrypted whereas my method will be on a macro-level with transparency at the heart. Accountability will be guaranteed with such a system. This will remove issues of fraud and corruption associated with fiat money. The system will use macro blockchains with bundles instead of individuals transactions. The system can be used in line with another idea of global digitals IDs. This is a form of identification that records and gives access to people without the need for government-issued passports.  Each person will apply online and submit digital attributes; fingerprints, an iris scan or even saliva, voice scans before given a digital identification like a scan code. The app will ask for face or iris, or saliva scan and the information sent digitally to a verifying organization or server who offer another pass as a scan code that will then be used to identify everyone making transactions. The idea is to link the person and the transaction digitally so there is traceability and accountability. All these transactions are recorded permanently and as the name says open or revealed to anyone if they can make an official request to access that information. This Apocalypto currency is not centralized in meaning that it is controlled by government no. It is centralized in that Tomorrow’s World Order will be responsible or will nominate someone or agency or body or private company to run this. The government will have no part nor lot in influencing this currency’s mining activities and will have no control in influencing it by say printing more as they do with fiat money this will keep inflation low and stabilize or even keep the currency at the above levels. How much digital Apocalypto currency will be mined or available depends on many factors, but the idea is to create a new system that settles today’s global debt and provide a clean sheet at that time we will put current fiat out of use; obsolete. So global debt stands today at $300 trillion so the money should be maybe quadruple enough to settle the debt leaving the globe with more available.

I think with digital currency it will be possible to have both at micro and macro-level in the economy, but I think a system must be in place that will see to it that crypto money will pay and be used for individual transactions and nothing to do with the government. If you want to pay for a government service, then you will need to convert the money to Apocalypto currency. So, Apocalyptic money will pay for government services and anything to do with institutions related to the government. A currency converter should be readily available the idea being that everything that uses Apocalypto money is related to the government or official global bodies and will be made transparent and every transaction regarding individuals and cryptocurrencies will be encrypted. Recording of transactions will be easy too as apocalyptic currencies will automatically be recorded on macro blockchains but after being bundled together. While cryptocurrency transactions are recorded on peer-to-peer micro blockchains. So, government officials will use apocalyptic money to pay for anything to do with the government and crypto for the private transaction and the transactions recorded separately even if carried out at the same time.  

Sincerely

David Gomadza

Signed

03 July 2019

Technology can be used to create a system of networking that links people globally and where people can offer say accommodation to travelers. The idea is to facilitate movements and provide easy access to accommodation where people if say on vacation, can lend their houses for certain times or just for certain hours and everything is done through gadgets and apps that checks the identity of the person and pay in digital currency instead of booking hotels, etc. This is to work complementing the hotels and hostels of course. The idea is to apply smart contracts where individuals do everything themselves as a peer-to-peer and void the middlemen and paying high fees. The idea is to increase accessibility and networking globally with prices the only restriction if you like. The government and banks to have no links. Government should not be linked to banks or have contracts with banks where the bank might borrow someone money in bad faith knowing that the government will buy that debt and make the person ‘a slave’ as what was happening after the financial crisis with governments not bailing-out banks but buying slaves in broad daylight whom they later tag and abuse and put on death row blackmailing them claiming that they wrote off their debt so they have to do what the government wants. The idea here is to change the current money system replacing or complementing this fiat with the Apocalypto currency that is digital but can have some notes made and printed but ideally is to make sure that the whole world use this single currency but the government can have their own digital currency as long as it does not have the problems of the fiat money system or as long as they agree to follow our monetary policy. I have dealt with the global money system now I will look at the global law system.

I think it will be ideal to develop software that uses the blockchains and the peer-to-peer system and apply this to law. This will create another form of the law system where individuals can collect information and evidence and log this to the blockchain and then give addresses where the information has been stored before submitted this to decentralized judges and courts that will supplement the current system. Laws will be easily downloaded on apps and phones. No one will be able to plead ignorance as the laws will be easily downloaded on apps. Like I wrote above I will remove all-time limits to all cases globally. If someone lives if they had committed a crime, they must be made accountable to that. The court system will be 24 hours courts operating no stop with information sent to the blockchain easily accessed and downloaded and everything made fast. The laws are referred to as the Apocalyptolaws because they will be transparent without any encryption so that everyone can easily see them and read them. It will be easy to report officials who think they are above the law with individuals sending information or incident and pictures of the people involved straight away for safekeeping on these blockchains. The advantage is that that transaction or act will have several attributes like the time and date and location and possibly recorded conversations and images as well. The gadgets will have other properties like the ability to identify the blockchains being used in that vicinity as addresses where the information is stored. The person will later check the blockchain or app activity for that month that can be easily downloaded like a bank statement where he or she can cross-reference and check the details of the incident. The app will have the ability to identify say all apps IDs that can be traced to individuals.

The idea is to present an alternative with the aim of completely abandoning the current system so that humanity will never revert to ways of doing things we are saying are now obsolete and must be changed.

I think blockchain has been a godsend and we haven’t seen what can be achieved through the system and the distributed ledger that has made it easy to record transactions instantly and permanently cutting off a lot of waste and unnecessary bureaucracy. The idea is to use this system to change all current methods and replace all with faster methods that use this blockchain system. All current government services and systems can be replaced by ones that use this system.

The identification system like I said in earlier chapters can be replaced by a system that is digital and one that uses the blockchain and distributed ledger so that IDs are easily obtained without the cumbersome time-wasting current system. I proposed the existence of an ID verifier who can be an agency or company contracted out or a smart server with results in minutes and a code given to confirm access. The scan code is then used to act as a pass-on top of the personal digital attributes used to ID a person. The system can be global something I am advocating and going to see-through. The idea is to sell the idea to those in power so that the private sector spearheads the change we need.

Blockchain and the distributed ledger and smart contract all present endless opportunities for improving or developing a new fast and fair voting system that reduces costs and mistakes and makes the whole thing transparency and faster. Linked to a person’s digital ID people can vote in larger numbers than now.

There is no doubt that the current system is slow and very costly. In fact, governments are providing these services simply to raise money than to provide a service. A lot can be done with blockchain and distributed ledger. The waiting times and the whole process after decades is not-fit for the purpose. The idea in the New World is to put more money in research and development that means the processes should be the best we have. There is no point in channeling $millions if not $billion when the system is slow taking longer and cumbersome and above all outdated. Blockchain and smart contract technologies can reduce waiting times and costs significantly. This is one of the critical areas that need a quick overhaul. Ideally, I would like a new system no matter what one that can be rated. This is the first step to modernize regardless if the current system is okay or not. If we are saying that all our problems are a direct result of the current outdated slow system, then the answer is to first put in a faster system so that the process of finding new technology and research is advanced. We must work hard on this area otherwise the whole project is a failure from the onset. This is a crucial area too as a major revenue for the governments concerned, they might push everyone else and chose to stick to what they know best then we are left with no choice but to put laws that will make sectors like this private. That is the offer to ambitious companies to handle these areas. I know this is controversial, but this is a critical area. Another issue is the fact that the government might ban aspiring companies or deny them licenses to do the same on the side and we are going to put international laws that make it a mandate that people have a choice and choose where they can register a patent or trademark. The idea is to give the company licenses too to do the same even cheaper and faster. Waiting for one to five years for a patent can’t be tolerated. Other areas I don’t mind this is a critical area and would prefer a 24-hour service for filling and all the needed checks and research. That also means super-fast search engines as there can be millions of items globally. I think developing technology is easy, the problems are to do with government bureaucracy.

Research and development are critical if we are to achieve our goals. The idea is to pass laws and remove all loopholes that make the process hard and offer an incentive. Governments usually discourage technological development indirectly through cumbersome laws and regulations. Laws should make the whole thing smoother.

We have seen what the blockchain can do for the financial system with the rise of the Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. The good thing is that this will increase the number of people who can do financial transactions without the need to have a government given bank account. This means those denied a bank account can easily be involved in financial transactions. This, in turn, will improve connectivity and networking the most two aspects of the next stage of human development. This is mainly peer-to-peer private transactions where privacy is important. But what about the government sector? Don’t they need a system similar? We know for sure the fiat money system is obsolete and not-fit purpose. Luckily, I have personally drafted a patent for an Apocalypto currency or simply FutureGoldCoin and or the Calycoin that is for government-to-government transactions. This is on a macro-level and since it’s the government we are talking about building trust, we want a system that is transparent and that make people accountable. Combining all the crypto and the digital identity system will make the system fit for purpose again. We can talk about the New World but if the monetary system is not fit for the purpose, we will still have the same issues we have today. I personally declared the system obsolete and new laws and financial system is the way forward. I explained in earlier chapters why and if that is correct then we have been mending an obsolete system for seventeen years? I think it’s time for a new way of doing things.

You can invent the best methods of doing things or the best monetary system there can be but if you don’t have the right leadership, I think it’s a waste of time and precious resources because after some time they are simply going to ban everything. I think this has been the case for the past decades. I think this is not the first time we had cryptocurrencies or other ways to supplement or replace the fiat money system. The whole system is meant that the status quo is never changed. Not because these are perfect ways of doing things, it’s hard to understand human nature. Some would rather waste resources to provide jobs for everyone than to improve services and become efficient and work fewer hours for more money. The idea in the New World is that time is very important. It will be a bad idea to trade time for money. In the future people will have other ways of making money easily. Time will be spent with loved ones and learning and inventing things. Digital currencies if understood will pave the way even if they last for a few years people will always find other better ways. So, the most important aspects now are creativity, innovation, and leadership. I think I will devote the next chapter to this topic; Leadership.

CHAPTER TWENTY

The business dictionary recognized that;

Leadership involves:

*Establishing a clear vision,

*Sharing that vision with others so that they will follow willingly;

*Providing the information, knowledge and methods to realize that vision, and coordinating and balancing the conflicting interests of all members and stakeholders.

*A leader steps up in times of crisis and can think and act creatively in difficult situations.

Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/leadership.html 

First, I differentiate between a terrorist and a New World visionary, a leader to lead the way by laying a clear path and vision to be followed. There is a great difference between a terrorist and the leaders of tomorrow of which I am. A terrorist is a vengeful person often according to him has been done wrong in the past and all that he is doing is revenging the past evil. Mostly they are not concerned about who dies. If people die these people will translate his feelings to whoever is the intended receipt of the message. So, terrorists use women and children and often target these killing as many as he can. He uses these as bargaining subjects with the aim that their cries will be his cries; their pain now was his pain in the past. In most cases, he has been through a lot directly and had lost a close one and this makes him kill without remorse. Most have what I can call local issues and their grievances are personal to them although they might use the religion to justify such acts. These people fight for the close ones and have a narrow focus in that their issues are localized.  Visionaries or world leaders like myself are people who feel like humanity is not doing what they can potentially do and act upon that notion. These people see the waste and devious acts of the current leaders abusing everyone so that they remain in power. Their intent is not to fight the current leadership. They are not freedom fighters and don’t feel oppressed. Leadership is not concerned with freeing oneself as they don’t feel oppressed or abused. Their cries are for all humanity. They look at what humans could have achieved over time and why humans have the issues they have. This is the general view. These people have big dreams not just to change the world but to improve the life of all mankind. They invent new methods they strongly believe will work to change the current system. They always propose new systems better to current systems and, in most cases, establish a new system to prove it works in the hope that and strongly believe that humanity will come to their senses and abandon the wasteful, useless often obsolete current systems.

I personally think humanity has missed several opportunities to advance the way we should have. I explained my views about life and humanity. I argued that life is not just life. Life is to be in stages of development and as such humanity has been stuck in one stage for centuries. Whose fault? I think there hasn’t been a leader with courage, a clear vision, and the methodology to achieve that vision. Most of the leaders have been concerned with local issues central to them rather than humanity at large. We as humans have had several opportunities to move to the next stage of development the networking and cooperation stage where technological development will help connect everyone globally so that for the first time there is trust among different people globally. Trust is the most important thing. I can’t blame humanity because a lot of things were working against trust. All surprise attacks, Pearl Harbor, Hiroshima, 9/11, etc. all have made it hard for anyone to talk about trust. Above all, this goes back to the beginning of the centuries with the two world wars. After the first war there was no leader to understand what was needed for humanity to move forward and as such what happened was talks about peace but without a clear vision of what world peace is and how we can achieve that. That was the first missed opportunity. What a visionary could have done was to oversee all the proceedings after the war. There lacked an unbiased person who would ban the war, draft new laws to ban the war there and then. Instead what happened is the creation of groups to cushion the effects of world wars rather than to stop the war completely. The LN was just there for cosmetics reasons just to make everything look good. It had no powers or have even attempted to ban wars and weapons production. That led to the Second World War. Even after the war what happened was another cushioning of the effects of war instead of stopping the war. A leader with a vision to pass laws there and then was not there. This time the West or Allies realized that wars were bad and never had a winner and as such changed their tactics from a defensive approach to an attack one. They then established the UN and the ICC to deal with the low-level threats mainly from Africa and NATO to back the USA and the UK who would be the leading countries in military attacks against any potential threats. We can see the problems developing already with all other people on a list drafted as part of a twenty to fifty-year war contingency plan. I explained in the other chapter that the West removed the fire alarms’ in wars and decided to let everyone stay in a burning building by putting strong firefighters in place in NATO, the USA, the UK, and the UN through sanctions and ICC through the courts. So technically if these institutions are in existence and without them evolving, we are going to be stuck in the defensive stages for decades. Mind you it has been seventy years since these come into place and has the world become a better place? If they were humans, they would be pensioners now and as such hanging on by a thread. Here comes the need for great leadership skills.

The needed leader is one who is a visionary and is true to himself and believes he has a world to lead if that means banning wars, weapons manufacturing, changing the financial system, changing the courts, I mean everything so be it. My vision is to lead all and show the correct path we should have taken decades ago. We have a moral duty and obligations to all to make sure that we won’t let a few people destroy all mankind. There are universal laws that give anyone a right to preserve humanity by showing the correct path especially when acts of some evil would result in the extinction of mankind. There are people who might take the law into their own hands and create mostly unknowingly a situation that will escalate and lead to human destruction. I think the current global leadership is tainted with the blood of innocent women and children and I personally think the line has been crossed unless a new system is put in place the world will always be the way it is with wars and all the killings and the wastage. If the world is beginning to trust each other is it not wise too to move away from the defensive economies which we are stuck in and save all these $trillion? Surely the world needs a new direction. The Iraq war was the final dagger into the system. The fact that even the UN acknowledged that the war was illegal makes it more mandatory to change the current system. It’s time I put new laws banning wars globally so that no one shall die or be killed unlawfully. Laws that bring perpetrators to justice. Laws that will never be overridden resulting in deaths of women and children. Laws that demand evolution or the closing of most of today’s institutions and practices. Laws that safeguards the life of every woman and child, regardless. Laws that put human life first where a command that unjustly results in the deaths of even a soldier can make the command giver be dragged to the courts. Laws that do not exempt or give immunity to acts of violence against women and children. Women and children are the voiceless people of any given society and a visionary would champion their cause and their safety. These are the people of tomorrow and if we let people kill these, then we are guilty too as this happened on our watch. All the above shall be the things of the past. The idea is not just to stop killings and unnecessary suffering but to improve the quality of life not just for women and children but for humanity alike. Our laws will remove all the obstacles to peace and the upholding of human rights. This is the big goal as all the problems we have today are due to people knowingly committing acts of violence directly or indirectly overriding common laws in favor of political and military strategies. There can never be such a thing ever again. Our laws will bring evil to justice for the next years. We need to start on a clean slate for the peace to take effect. 

Technological advancement is paramount in the next stage and strong leadership is a must. Current laws are there to keep the status quo. The laws are drafted so that moving away from this tried and trusted stage is difficult if not impossible. The current leaders out of unfounded fear or experienced past evil acts will and might resist change. Strong leadership is needed to facilitate the development of technology. Only technology will see us through this stage. It’s not just about technology as the current leaders will simply frustrate development by imposing restrictions or refusing to change. Change will only come when everyone understands and appreciates that the current system is obsolete, and change is imminent and inevitable. With good leadership, technology will make everything easy and fast. Technology will help the globe link and trust each other through fast communication and connections. Technology will make us realize that we don’t need these obsolete forms of weapons and machinery that are heavy, relies on precious metals and fossil fuels, etc. We are in the digital age and we must move with the times. A strong leadership is needed and will negotiate on behalf of all technology-developers. To make it easy for their new systems to be appreciated and adopted if not by the mainstream then by an alternative system. I mentioned above the need for fast digital global identification systems. But the government might stifle progress by a cumbersome bureaucratic system and regulations, etc. A strong leadership will make it easy to establish a decentralized global system of governance as an alternative of the mainstream working side by side as a transitional phase until the government is able to improve its services as well. Good leadership will not just propose laws and regulations but will see to it that every government must follow these. This leadership must see to it that these laws are followed. My leadership is not about establishing another UN or NATO but about showing the injustice being down and let these institutions evolve. Evolve or cease operations simply because everything they stand for conflicts with the vision of the New World. There are so many areas that need changing and good leadership will come in handy hence the rise of TWO.

We are to lay down our vision of the world which humanity should know about and acknowledge and in the end be part of. This is for the good of everyone. We have a duty to make sure that a few people will not end up destroying everyone else. We have taken a leadership role because the situation has made us stand up. Instead of jumping out of the bus that is going to nosedive over a cliff thereby killing everyone, we have decided to stop the driver and let us drive the bus in the other direction. I think the world now is one-sided biased and getting more and more evil as they join cults and grow to enormous sizes. We saw the impact of such a situation during the Iraq war where there was no one to even try to stop the war with the resultant deaths of women and children. I think humanity is not performing as it should be. We are wasting a lot of resources on defense when we are forming networks globally and becoming friends with our once sworn enemies. So, there is no need for making weapons and keep investing in the military. All these decades it made sense to keep making weapons as there were sworn enemies but over the decades we have evolved as humans to realize that wars are a thing of the past. So, our concern is with the huge global weapons and military budget of over $1,7 trillion in 2017. Surely, it’s a waste. All this money can be channeled elsewhere especially into technological development and modern infrastructure that does not use fossil fuels or materials that are not good to humans. Our duty is to facilitate good management and the wise use of resources globally. We shall be the leaders by ensuring that everything, laws, regulations, infrastructure, etc. support and favors technological advancement. Also, they are all modern; in line with current tastes. We shall facilitate research and development and provide a platform necessary for companies, individuals and governments to easily do what is better for all of mankind by finding new energy sources and new ways of doing things. We shall remove all obstacles and close loopholes exploited to frustrate progress. Imagine when one country can simply ban or block a useful technology simply because that technology will put them out of business. We will have global powers to offer licenses as well especially if it is a new technology. Our aim is to modernize the whole system by offering a new platform a global platform with universal appeal that if businesses are denied a license in certain countries, we will be able to provide such a license that will cover the rest of the world. Tomorrow’s World Order will have powers over any President or Prime Minister. We shall have the last say if it comes to doing business globally. You can be denied a license in one country, but we will provide a global license, but the license might not include the country you were denied licenses. We will also respect individuals’ country’s sovereignty if they don’t break our laws which are universal with universal jurisdiction. We are like a second chance to every businessmen and women. A good leader will lay out a vision and provide the information and methods to achieve that vision facilitating progress and removing all obstacles and making sure that that dream is realized. We are neutral we are not aligned to any country or religion or political party.

The trend at this time is the invention of a new system that will work alongside the current system. We have witnessed a new way of doing things and even the current leadership does not know what to do simply because it the new technology for a New World and this world is better than the current system. They are unsure of what to do. The current system biased because it benefits only those who put the system there. People are complaining and shouting for change because they are the ones who are feeling the pinch. Everyone who has worked hard to come up with a better alternative is somehow disadvantaged. They say necessity is the mother of invention. The inventors are the people who see the wrongs. Very often governments don’t change the status quo because what is there is there for a reason. That delay in processing e.g.; a patent is there for a reason. That high cost is there for a reason. So, any request for change is a war starter with the current establishment simply because it’s interfering with the way they run their government and if allowed to then you might hit them in the pocket. I explained in another chapter that intelligence is like beauty it is in the eyes of the beholder. You won’t be shocked to find out that the way things are is the perfect way for the governments and their leaders. Chaos is the new way to do things. If you have a perfect system, then how are you going to justify charging those high fees? If you have fast processing times, then what are all those employees going to do when there are no more customers? There is corruption and fraud so that the Mayor has something to talk about. We have people killing women and children so that we have courts to deal with them. So, everything you might be saying is a waste, some people see it as an opportunity. A way to fill a gap. A way to fulfill political agendas. A way to maintain huge employee numbers, etc. A fast system will mean doing the same job at a fraction that means to break even you would need a lot of people than say the current government’s system that requires a few people but who pay high prices. The government benefits so all the talks about better this and better that conflict with the goals of the government’s leaders. So is this the true picture. Money is not everything. Can this saying be relevant here? I highlighted that during the 1960s after people realized that it was a waste of spending money on wars that they started campaigning against the wars. The governments of the world then went on to create hoaxes about aliens etc. to keep everyone prioritizing defense. Conspiracy theorist thinks 9/11 was a government inside job to frighten people so that defense becomes our main concern as 9/11 left people vulnerable and fearful and so that they act on a 25-year-old contingency plan and invade Iraq. So, if this is the case that governments must go a long way to defend this how do we go about this? Is just good leadership enough?  Leadership is not about bending to evil demands nor negotiating with evil. Leadership is about setting the right path and showing the people how to achieve that vision even if it means conflict with the governments. Our vision is for the betterment of all humanity. We have waited to see if these leaders will come to their senses and change. But over the past seventy years, nothing seems to be going to change. We have a vision to ban anything to do with the military and to destroy all stockpiles of weapons, etc. mainly because they are used to justify killing women and children. To aim to guide the current leaders by drafting and implementing laws that will make these leaders avoid persecution after leaving offices. The current laws and systems are cornering these leaders and trapping them by creating a situation where they act out of the heat of the moment ending up killing innocent women and children.  Then after office-term, they are then blackmailed and chased by the courts or end up being given protection by the hospitals but used as guinea pigs. That shows that the current system is not fair but needs changing. We don’t want honorable leaders to be treated like criminals later in life. We want a way of guaranteeing their safety and to remove any risk of going through the courts in retirement or having them held to ransom being asked to sign or agree to Protectorate agreements. We believe that this is a dark form of blackmail synonymous with slavery and something we must never tolerate. This gives us the power to do what is right. Our laws will make sure that no one President, Prime Minister or not will override these laws in favor of the military. We will have banned the wars, weapons manufacturing, making of digital agents or cyber gadgets used to electromagnetically attack ethnics, etc. Our leadership is the kind of leadership that will make the world a better place. We ask for our laws to be obeyed. We believe now that it’s time we take a different route. The current situation where ‘the leaders’ actually make WMDs in the form of nuclear weapons and declare that these are for deterrence purposes only conflicts with our laws. Why? This is because they use the weapons to threaten wars to countries who might have nukes. This is irresponsible as they both might use the nukes if things get out of hand. This we believe can only lead to human extinction. This is because they both might poses nukes; they can use on each other with catastrophic consequences we don’t want another Hiroshima or Nagasaki for that matter. We are neutral and have no WMDs and will never have. We don’t rely only on negotiating and cooperation we know this is the way some governments make money or work. If no life is wasted needlessly, we shall try to negotiate and lead by example as well showing what is needed to be done. Our visions are huge, and we see a world without the main thing wars are fought for; oil. All fossil fuel usage shall be a thing of the past. We shall encourage other forms of energy. We aim to phase out all fossil fuel means of transport by a certain date globally. Our policies will remove everything that is creating all the issues we have today. These will have the ‘multiplier effect’ of spreading the benefits and because of that solving other issues. The perfect example is banning fossil fuels that in turn works towards reducing atmospheric gaseous hence reduces global warming and makes people invest in cheaper and cleaner technology that improves the quality of life. We don’t want to talk about climate change and increase fossil fuel vehicles’ production. We have adopted a holistic approach. Priorities life then the rest will follow. If you are a leader. You will not override this rule the right to life and to self-preserve if there are risks of killing innocent women and children. You would not send soldiers when there are chances, they will get killed easily say with roadside bombs. You might send snipers and not start a war. That way you are guaranteed your retirement in peace. We will do our best not to judge because of differences but we shall consider putting laws and enforcing these laws whenever we think the same differences might have influenced the decision and assessing if we can bring more charges on top. A perfect example is the fact that to kill Saddam they send the military, yet Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. To kill the ‘real person behind the 9/11’ masterminded they sent a sniper. So, we can check why Obama e.g. of the same religion and genetic heritage choose a sniper and not the military especially if Osama was the man behind 9/11. If it was another President, would he have sent a sniper too? Could the same method have been used and with what success and above all could the lives of women and children have been saved? We will look also if the victims were the same color as the command giver could he had given the same command knowing they would have been killed. We shall be very tough that all these leaders who are cocky today will obey our laws. The idea especially one that will make these leaders think twice is the fact that to protect your family depends on your actions too regarding the family of others. Some crimes will make it easy to jeopardize the life of your own as a deterrent as killing a certain number directly or indirectly can put them on the table as well. To protect life, one must fear killing others to protect his own life too. If you care for your own, then you would not kill someone else. Our laws will make it hard to be broken without shooting yourself in the head. That is the kind of leadership we have. We mean business. When we say we want peace we mean peace? The world will get. The way we drafted the laws is self-defending as those who think are above the law will mouse trap-themselves. It will be like fighting the goads. You won’t win in the end our laws will prevail because everyone will swear that one man for himself and TWO for us all. Mind you we will be educating and promoting high self-esteem boosting techniques until people wish they can live forever. We will ban wars; a huge cause of misery. Ban making of bio-threats and digital ones and even the cyber ones. We will make life be enjoyed again by everyone. I know as I argued throughout the book the strategy of eliminating opposition adopted since the Second World War is the Colony Collapse Strategy and trust me it works see the list in one of the chapters. We shall be fair and use our laws too to target threats to peace. Threats to life for women and children and these shall be targeted individually. Even bodyguards won’t die for anyone. No one shall plead that they don’t know our laws for we shall use advanced technology and make all laws be easily read or downloaded on phones. This related to all countries on earth. I am only emphasizing this because I think if there is opposition it will come from the people who are doing all these things which we said are wrong. Planning to kill others in masses to play God and control the population.

A thing for the past. Leadership is about putting an effective system that is fair that can’t be manipulated. Our system will make these leaders ‘self-terminate’ We are not asking anyone to be Jesus. We are only saying that we made the regulations and norms you already knew anywhere into laws. You cannot kill or make a command or decisions that can result in the death of someone else unless you are tired of living. Effective leadership is putting laws and methods to see your plans through and change current perception with little effort and make the world a better place. The new laws will be in all areas to facilitate and encourage good practices and respect for life. Some countries have no respect for the lives of others. This has slavery connotations and must not be encouraged. The stretching of work for financial gains will be outlawed maybe indirectly by reducing the number of hours people work and which days are worked. I think the current system is flawed. Our new system will make it easy for people to work for a few hours but make more money. It’s not just about life but about the quality of life as well. 

CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE